OGLAS

Intel Core i9-10850K recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 3 od 6

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL testovi

PCMark 10Ryzen 7 5800X: 7.497Ryzen 7 5800X7.497Core i9-10850K: 7.423Core i9-10850K7.423Ryzen 9 5950X: 7.316Ryzen 9 5950X7.316Ryzen 9 5900X: 7.251Ryzen 9 5900X7.251Ryzen 5 5600X: 6.910Ryzen 5 5600X6.910Core i7-10700K: 6.346Core i7-10700K6.346Ryzen 9 3950X: 6.249Ryzen 9 3950X6.249Ryzen 9 3900X: 6.222Ryzen 9 3900X6.222Ryzen 7 3800XT: 6.129Ryzen 7 3800XT6.129Ryzen 9 3900XT: 6.095Ryzen 9 3900XT6.095Core i5-10600K: 6.067Core i5-10600K6.067Ryzen 5 3600X: 5.976Ryzen 5 3600X5.976Ryzen 3 3300X: 5.753Ryzen 3 3300X5.753Core i5-10500: 5.610Core i5-105005.610Ryzen 7 2700X: 5.523Ryzen 7 2700X5.523Core i5-10400: 5.513Core i5-104005.513Ryzen 3 3100: 5.085Ryzen 3 31005.08508.247
3DMark TimeSpyRyzen 9 5950X: 10.043Ryzen 9 5950X10.043Ryzen 9 5900X: 9.991Ryzen 9 5900X9.991Ryzen 9 3900XT: 9.960Ryzen 9 3900XT9.960Ryzen 7 5800X: 9.906Ryzen 7 5800X9.906Core i9-10850K: 9.873Core i9-10850K9.873Core i7-10700K: 9.537Core i7-10700K9.537Ryzen 9 3950X: 9.478Ryzen 9 3950X9.478Ryzen 9 3900X: 9.337Ryzen 9 3900X9.337Ryzen 5 5600X: 9.336Ryzen 5 5600X9.336Ryzen 7 3800XT: 9.258Ryzen 7 3800XT9.258Core i5-10500: 8.946Core i5-105008.946Core i5-10600K: 8.897Core i5-10600K8.897Core i5-10400: 8.747Core i5-104008.747Ryzen 3 3300X: 8.332Ryzen 3 3300X8.332Ryzen 3 3100: 8.166Ryzen 3 31008.166011.047

PCMark 10 mjeri općenite performanse sistema, a 3DMark nam kombinirane performanse snage procesora i grafike. 10850K je postigao odličan rezultat u PCMarku za što je zaslužan njegov visoki radni takt, no u TimeSpy testu je ipak nešto malo slabiji od četiri Ryzena, te nešto jači od 10700K.

CPU testovi

7-ZIPRyzen 9 5950X: 143.760Ryzen 9 5950X143.760Ryzen 9 3950X: 132.846Ryzen 9 3950X132.846Ryzen 9 5900X: 122.346Ryzen 9 5900X122.346Ryzen 9 3900XT: 110.853Ryzen 9 3900XT110.853Ryzen 9 3900X: 110.418Ryzen 9 3900X110.418Ryzen 7 5800X: 95.012Ryzen 7 5800X95.012Core i9-10850K: 83.266Core i9-10850K83.266Ryzen 7 3800XT: 81.305Ryzen 7 3800XT81.305Core i7-10700K: 71.450Core i7-10700K71.450Ryzen 5 5600X: 70.253Ryzen 5 5600X70.253Ryzen 7 3700X: 56.540Ryzen 7 3700X56.540Core i5-10600K: 56.338Core i5-10600K56.338Core i5-10500: 52.333Core i5-1050052.333Core i5-10400: 50.744Core i5-1040050.744i7-6950X: 50.375i7-6950X50.375Ryzen 7 2700X: 48.030Ryzen 7 2700X48.030Ryzen 7 2700: 42.859Ryzen 7 270042.859Ryzen 7 1800X: 41.197Ryzen 7 1800X41.197i7-8700K: 40.613i7-8700K40.613i7-5960X: 40.065i7-5960X40.065Ryzen 7 1700X: 39.010Ryzen 7 1700X39.010Ryzen 5 2600X: 37.676Ryzen 5 2600X37.676i7-7800X: 37.543i7-7800X37.543Ryzen 7 1700: 36.906Ryzen 7 170036.906i7-4960X: 35.921i7-4960X35.921i7-3960X: 34.371i7-3960X34.371Ryzen 5 2600: 33.967Ryzen 5 260033.967i7-5930K: 32.228i7-5930K32.228Ryzen 5 1600X: 32.093Ryzen 5 1600X32.093Ryzen 3 3300X: 31.909Ryzen 3 3300X31.909i7-5820K: 31.261i7-5820K31.261Ryzen 5 1600: 31.200Ryzen 5 160031.200i7-980X: 29.058i7-980X29.058i7-3930K: 28.938i7-3930K28.938Ryzen 3 3100: 28.569Ryzen 3 310028.569i7-7700K: 28.583i7-7700K28.583i5-8600K: 28.294i5-8600K28.294i7-6700K: 26.328i7-6700K26.328i7-4790K: 26.327i7-4790K26.327i7-3770K: 24.437i7-3770K24.437i7-4770K: 23.564i7-4770K23.564Ryzen 5 1500X: 22.909Ryzen 5 1500X22.909Ryzen 5 2400G: 21.251Ryzen 5 2400G21.251FX-8150: 20.957FX-815020.957i7-2600K: 20.101i7-2600K20.101Ryzen 5 1400: 20.016Ryzen 5 140020.016i5-4690K: 18.528i5-4690K18.528i5-6600K: 18.155i5-6600K18.155i5-4670K: 17.203i5-4670K17.203i5-7500: 16.598i5-750016.598Ryzen 3 1300X: 14.896Ryzen 3 1300X14.896Ryzen 3 2200G: 14.871Ryzen 3 2200G14.871Athlon 3000G: 14.629Athlon 3000G14.629i5-2500K: 14.254i5-2500K14.254Athlon 200GE: 13.585Athlon 200GE13.585Ryzen 3 1200: 12.560Ryzen 3 120012.5600158.136

Zanimljivo. Ovdje je 10850K dosta sporiji od 8-jezgrenog Ryzena 7 5800X, a u nižim grafovima ćemo vidjeti pravo stanje stvari.

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 5950X: 116,49Ryzen 9 5950X116,49Ryzen 9 3950X: 121,84Ryzen 9 3950X121,84Ryzen 9 5900X: 143,12Ryzen 9 5900X143,12Ryzen 9 3900XT: 156,62Ryzen 9 3900XT156,62Ryzen 9 3900X: 157,37Ryzen 9 3900X157,37Core i9-10850K: 172,34Core i9-10850K172,34Ryzen 7 5800X: 201,36Ryzen 7 5800X201,36Ryzen 7 3800XT: 202,42Ryzen 7 3800XT202,42Core i7-10700K: 218,38Core i7-10700K218,38Ryzen R7 3700X: 232,95Ryzen R7 3700X232,95Ryzen 7 2700X: 264,82Ryzen 7 2700X264,82Ryzen 5 5600X: 271,89Ryzen 5 5600X271,89i7-8700K: 283,41i7-8700K283,41Ryzen 7 1800X: 299,64Ryzen 7 1800X299,64Ryzen 7 2700: 301,5Ryzen 7 2700301,5Core i5-10600K: 301,74Core i5-10600K301,74Ryzen 5 3600X: 312,96Ryzen 5 3600X312,96Core i5-10400: 342,96Core i5-10400342,96Ryzen 5 2600X: 344,84Ryzen 5 2600X344,84i7-7800X: 355,05i7-7800X355,05Core i5-10500: 357,47Core i5-10500357,47Ryzen 5 2600: 366,65Ryzen 5 2600366,65i5-8600K: 406,55i5-8600K406,55Ryzen 3 3300X: 436,05Ryzen 3 3300X436,05Ryzen 3 3100: 485,94Ryzen 3 3100485,94Ryzen 5 2400G: 571,87Ryzen 5 2400G571,87Ryzen 3 2200G: 874,16Ryzen 3 2200G874,16Athlon 200GE: 1.320,23Athlon 200GE1.320,23Athlon 3000G: 1.327,75Athlon 3000G1.327,7501.461

Ovdje su stvari ipak posložene prema očekivanju. Ryzen 7 5800X (8C/16T) je nešto sporiji, a Ryzeni 9 3900X/5900X (12C/24T) su nešto brži od i9-10850K (10C/20T).

Cinebench 15Ryzen 9 5950X: 4.394Ryzen 9 5950X4.394Ryzen 9 3950X: 4.057Ryzen 9 3950X4.057Ryzen 9 5900X: 3.638Ryzen 9 5900X3.638Ryzen 9 3900X: 3.188Ryzen 9 3900X3.188Ryzen 9 3900XT: 3.175Ryzen 9 3900XT3.175Ryzen 7 5800X: 2.595Ryzen 7 5800X2.595Core i9-10850K: 2.575Core i9-10850K2.575Ryzen 7 3800XT: 2.230Ryzen 7 3800XT2.230Ryzen 7 3700X: 2.137Ryzen 7 3700X2.137Core i7-10700K: 2.038Core i7-10700K2.038Ryzen 5 5600X: 1.907Ryzen 5 5600X1.907i7-6950X: 1.864i7-6950X1.864Ryzen 7 2700X: 1.828Ryzen 7 2700X1.828Ryzen 7 1800X: 1.624Ryzen 7 1800X1.624Ryzen 7 2700: 1.588Ryzen 7 27001.588Ryzen 5 3600X: 1.582Ryzen 5 3600X1.582i7-8700K: 1.546i7-8700K1.546Ryzen 7 1700X: 1.542Ryzen 7 1700X1.542Core i5-10600K: 1.415Core i5-10600K1.415Ryzen 7 1700: 1.403Ryzen 7 17001.403i7-5960X: 1.377i7-5960X1.377Ryzen 5 2600X: 1.368Ryzen 5 2600X1.368Core i5-10500: 1.332Core i5-105001.332Core i5-10400: 1.302Core i5-104001.302Ryzen 5 2600: 1.301Ryzen 5 26001.301i7-7800X: 1.264i7-7800X1.264Ryzen 5 1600X: 1.241Ryzen 5 1600X1.241Ryzen 3 3300X: 1.133Ryzen 3 3300X1.133Ryzen 5 1600: 1.129Ryzen 5 16001.129i7-5930K: 1.101i7-5930K1.101i7-5820K: 1.074i7-5820K1.074i5-8600K: 1.030i5-8600K1.030Ryzen 3 3100: 1.015Ryzen 3 31001.015i7-7700K: 989i7-7700K989i7-6700K: 935i7-6700K935Ryzen 5 2400G: 829Ryzen 5 2400G829Ryzen 5 1500X: 814Ryzen 5 1500X814Ryzen 5 1400: 703Ryzen 5 1400703i5-6600K: 651i5-6600K651i3-8100: 604i3-8100604i5-7500: 596i5-7500596Ryzen 3 2200G: 567Ryzen 3 2200G567Ryzen 3 1300X: 558Ryzen 3 1300X558Ryzen 3 1200: 482Ryzen 3 1200482i3-7350K: 445i3-7350K445Athlon 3000G: 377Athlon 3000G377Athlon 200GE: 357Athlon 200GE35704.833

Stariji Cinebench 15 i rezultat koji je gotovo pa identičan onome Ryzena 7 5800X. Razloge treba tražiti u single core performansama, što će biti vidljivo iz Cinebench 20 1t testa.

Cinebench 20 nTRyzen 9 5950X: 10.035Ryzen 9 5950X10.035Ryzen 9 3950X: 9.265Ryzen 9 3950X9.265Ryzen 9 5900X: 8.380Ryzen 9 5900X8.380Ryzen 9 3900XT: 7.302Ryzen 9 3900XT7.302Ryzen 9 3900X: 7.237Ryzen 9 3900X7.237Core i9-10850K: 6.164Core i9-10850K6.164Ryzen 7 5800X: 6.001Ryzen 7 5800X6.001Ryzen 7 3800XT: 5.123Ryzen 7 3800XT5.123Core i7-10700K: 4.936Core i7-10700K4.936Ryzen 7 3700X: 4.916Ryzen 7 3700X4.916Ryzen 5 5600X: 4.351Ryzen 5 5600X4.351Ryzen 7 2700X: 3.857Ryzen 7 2700X3.857Core i5-10600K: 3.592Core i5-10600K3.592Core i7-8700K: 3.408Core i7-8700K3.408Ryzen 5 3600X: 3.369Ryzen 5 3600X3.369Core i5-10400: 3.147Core i5-104003.147Core i5-10500: 3.055Core i5-105003.055Ryzen 3 3300X: 2.583Ryzen 3 3300X2.583Ryzen 3 3100: 2.340Ryzen 3 31002.340011.039

U novijoj je dvadesetki 10850K ipak malo brži od 8-jezgrenog Ryzena.

Cinebench 20 1TRyzen 9 5950X: 640Ryzen 9 5950X640Ryzen 9 5900X: 628Ryzen 9 5900X628Ryzen 7 5800X: 624Ryzen 7 5800X624Ryzen 5 5600X: 595Ryzen 5 5600X595Ryzen 9 3900XT: 518Ryzen 9 3900XT518Core i7-10700K: 512Core i7-10700K512Core i9-10850K: 507Core i9-10850K5070704

1T (single thread) rezultati pokazuju zašto je 8-jezgreni Ryzen samo malo sporiji od 10-jezgrenog Core procesora. AMD je s 5000 serijom (Zen 3), znatno unaprijedio single thread performanse i to se vidi.

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 5950X: 47Ryzen 9 5950X47Ryzen 9 5900X: 58Ryzen 9 5900X58Ryzen 9 3950X: 61Ryzen 9 3950X61Ryzen 9 3900X: 72Ryzen 9 3900X72Ryzen 9 3900XT: 72Ryzen 9 3900XT72Core i9-10850K: 76Core i9-10850K76Ryzen 7 5800X: 92Ryzen 7 5800X92Core i7-10700K: 96Core i7-10700K96Ryzen 7 3800XT: 104Ryzen 7 3800XT104Ryzen 7 3700X: 112Ryzen 7 3700X112Ryzen 7 2700X: 118Ryzen 7 2700X118Ryzen 5 5600X: 123Ryzen 5 5600X123Core i5-10600K: 134Core i5-10600K134Core i7-8700K: 141Core i7-8700K141Ryzen 5 3600X: 144Ryzen 5 3600X144Core i5-10500: 146Core i5-10500146Core i5-10400: 148Core i5-10400148Ryzen 3 3300X: 202Ryzen 3 3300X202Ryzen 3 3100: 233Ryzen 3 31002330256

Corona Renderer je fotorealistični renderer dostupan za Autodeskov 3ds Max ili kao standalone CLI aplikacija. Razvija se i verzija za Maxon Cinemu 4D. Dostupan je i benchmark koji automatski renderira scenu i izbacuje rezultat u sekundama, te u Rays/sec.

Ovdje 10850K ne zaostaje previše za 12-jezgrenim AMD procesorima starije generacije, no 5900X mu ipak znatnije bježi. 5800X je sporiji, tj. tek malo brži od 10700K.

HandbrakeRyzen 9 5900X: 74,33Ryzen 9 5900X74,33Ryzen 9 5950X: 73,65Ryzen 9 5950X73,65Ryzen 9 3900X: 69,6Ryzen 9 3900X69,6Ryzen 9 3900XT: 66,52Ryzen 9 3900XT66,52Ryzen 7 5800X: 61,25Ryzen 7 5800X61,25Ryzen 7 3800XT: 61,01Ryzen 7 3800XT61,01Core i9-10850K: 60,41Core i9-10850K60,41Core i7-10700K: 52,66Core i7-10700K52,66Ryzen 5 5600X: 50,12Ryzen 5 5600X50,12Core i7-8700K: 42,57Core i7-8700K42,57Core i5-10600K: 41,3Core i5-10600K41,3Core i5-10400: 39,59Core i5-1040039,59Core i5-10500: 38,85Core i5-1050038,85Ryzen 3 3300X: 34,09Ryzen 3 3300X34,09Ryzen 7 2700X: 32,23Ryzen 7 2700X32,23082

Handbrake performanse su ponovno u rangu 8-jezgrenog 5800X.

JetStream 2 benchmark (score,više je bolje)Ryzen 7 5800X: 204,78Ryzen 7 5800X204,78Ryzen 9 5950X: 198,742Ryzen 9 5950X198,742Ryzen 9 5900X: 195,904Ryzen 9 5900X195,904Ryzen 5 5600X: 192,449Ryzen 5 5600X192,449Core i9-10850K: 176,918Core i9-10850K176,918Core i7-10700K: 161,32Core i7-10700K161,32Ryzen 9 3900X: 156Ryzen 9 3900X156Ryzen 7 3800XT: 154,69Ryzen 7 3800XT154,69Ryzen 9 3900XT: 152,847Ryzen 9 3900XT152,847Ryzen 3 3300X: 149,55Ryzen 3 3300X149,55Core i5-10600K: 148,66Core i5-10600K148,66Core i5-10500: 141,54Core i5-10500141,54Core i7-8700K: 140,77Core i7-8700K140,77Core i5-10400: 137,226Core i5-10400137,226Ryzen 3 3100: 127,09Ryzen 3 3100127,090225

JetStream 2 je browser benchmark koji se fokusira na web aplikacije, koji kombinira JavaScript i Web Assembly benchmarke koji pokrivaju različite napredne poslove i tehnike programiranja te izbacuje rezultat na temelju toga. Veći broj znači bolje performanse, a ovdje je 10850K dosta brži od 10700K, no AMD-i nove generacije su daleko ispred.

Puget Systems Premiere Pro benchmark (score,više je bolje)Ryzen 7 5800X: 737Ryzen 7 5800X737Ryzen 9 5900X: 652,5Ryzen 9 5900X652,5Ryzen 9 5950X: 647Ryzen 9 5950X647Core i9-10850K: 646Core i9-10850K646Ryzen 9 3900XT: 622Ryzen 9 3900XT622Ryzen 9 3900X: 609Ryzen 9 3900X609Core i7-10700K: 541,5Core i7-10700K541,5Ryzen 7 3800XT: 541,5Ryzen 7 3800XT541,5Core i5-10600K: 439,5Core i5-10600K439,5Core i5-10500: 433Core i5-10500433Core i7-8700K: 409Core i7-8700K409Ryzen 5 5600X: 405Ryzen 5 5600X405Core i5-10400: 384,5Core i5-10400384,5Ryzen 3 3300X: 379,5Ryzen 3 3300X379,5Ryzen 3 3100: 349Ryzen 3 31003490811

Puget Systems je američka tvrtka iz Seattlea koja se bavi gradnjom računala. U svom radu koriste nekoliko benchmarka kojima ocjenjuju brzinu radnih stanica pa tako i ovaj Adobe Premiere Pro benchmark.

Premiere Pro benchmark je 10850K solidno odradio, kao i Ryzeni 9, no ovdje je Ryzen 7 5800X ipak kralj.

Puget Systems DaVinci Resolve 4K test (score,više je bolje)Core i9-10850K: 959Core i9-10850K959Ryzen 9 5900X: 754Ryzen 9 5900X754Ryzen 9 3950X: 748Ryzen 9 3950X748Ryzen 7 5800X: 738Ryzen 7 5800X738Ryzen 9 3900XT: 736Ryzen 9 3900XT736Ryzen 9 5950X: 736Ryzen 9 5950X736Ryzen 9 3900X: 732Ryzen 9 3900X732Ryzen 7 3800XT: 716Ryzen 7 3800XT716Core i7-10700K: 693Core i7-10700K693Core i5-10600K: 622Core i5-10600K622Ryzen 5 5600X: 621Ryzen 5 5600X621Core i5-10500: 616Core i5-10500616Core i5-10400: 598Core i5-10400598Core i7-8700K: 582Core i7-8700K582Ryzen 3 3300X: 549Ryzen 3 3300X549Ryzen 3 3100: 522Ryzen 3 310052201.055

DaVinci rezultat vraća nadu u Core procesore, 10850K je rasturio. Očito mu izvrsno leže promjenjivi uvjeti gdje nisu uvijek potrebne sve raspoložive jezgre, kao primjerice visoki takt.

V-Ray Benchmark 1.0.8 (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 5950X: 32Ryzen 9 5950X32Ryzen 9 3950X: 36Ryzen 9 3950X36Ryzen 9 5900X: 39Ryzen 9 5900X39Ryzen R9 3900X: 46Ryzen R9 3900X46Ryzen 9 3900XT: 46Ryzen 9 3900XT46Core i9-10850K: 52Core i9-10850K52Ryzen 7 5800X: 55Ryzen 7 5800X55Ryzen 7 3800XT: 64Ryzen 7 3800XT64Core i7-10700K: 65Core i7-10700K65Ryzen 7 3700X: 69Ryzen 7 3700X69Ryzen 5 5600X: 75Ryzen 5 5600X75Core i5-10600K: 89Core i5-10600K89Core i5-8700K: 91Core i5-8700K91Ryzen 5 3600X: 93Ryzen 5 3600X93Core i5-10400: 101Core i5-10400101Core i5-10500: 104Core i5-10500104Ryzen 3 3300X: 122Ryzen 3 3300X122Ryzen 3 3100: 140Ryzen 3 31001400154

V-Ray Benchmark je proizvod ChaosGroup-a koji je stand-alone aplikacija za mjerenje performansi procesora i grafike u renderiranju. Dostupan je za 3ds Max, Mayu, Cinemu 4D, Blender, SketchUp itd.

Koristimo ovaj stariji V-ray zbog usporedbe s ranije testiranim procesorima, a 10850K je ovdje nešto brži od 5800X, te sporiji od 12-jezgrenih AMD-a. Kako novih, tako i starih.

wPrime 2.0Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: 23,91Ryzen Threadripper 3970X23,91Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 31,56Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX31,56Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX: 38,556Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX38,556Ryzen 9 3950X: 42,36Ryzen 9 3950X42,36Ryzen 9 5950X: 45,9Ryzen 9 5950X45,9Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: 49,234Ryzen Threadripper 2950X49,234Threadripper 1950X: 54,145Threadripper 1950X54,145Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: 56,142Ryzen Threadripper 2920X56,142Ryzen 9 3900X: 56,412Ryzen 9 3900X56,412Ryzen 9 3900XT: 56,456Ryzen 9 3900XT56,456Ryzen 9 5900X: 59,96Ryzen 9 5900X59,96Threadripper 1920X: 62,553Threadripper 1920X62,553Core i9-10850K: 67,975Core i9-10850K67,975i7-6950X: 69,205i7-6950X69,205Ryzen 7 3800XT: 80,08Ryzen 7 3800XT80,08Ryzen R7 3700X: 82,79Ryzen R7 3700X82,79Core i7-10700K: 85,27Core i7-10700K85,27Ryzen 7 5800X: 86,58Ryzen 7 5800X86,58Ryzen 7 2700X: 86,854Ryzen 7 2700X86,854Ryzen 7 1800X: 95,624Ryzen 7 1800X95,624i7-8700K: 103,919i7-8700K103,919Ryzen 7 1700X: 106,855Ryzen 7 1700X106,855Ryzen 7 2700: 108,265Ryzen 7 2700108,265i7-5960X: 110,626i7-5960X110,626Ryzen 5 3600X: 113,335Ryzen 5 3600X113,335Ryzen 5 5600X: 116,435Ryzen 5 5600X116,435Ryzen 7 1700: 116,929Ryzen 7 1700116,929Core i5-10600K: 118,65Core i5-10600K118,65i7-7800X: 121,355i7-7800X121,355Ryzen 5 2600X: 126,153Ryzen 5 2600X126,153Ryzen 5 2600: 126,752Ryzen 5 2600126,752i7-4960X: 129,637i7-4960X129,637Core i5-10500: 131,25Core i5-10500131,25Core i5-10400: 133,254Core i5-10400133,254i7-3960X: 135,127i7-3960X135,127i7-5930K: 135,435i7-5930K135,435Ryzen 5 1600X: 136,293Ryzen 5 1600X136,293i7-5820K: 138,705i7-5820K138,705Ryzen 5 1600: 140,245Ryzen 5 1600140,245i7-3930K: 149,89i7-3930K149,89Ryzen 3 3300X: 158,55Ryzen 3 3300X158,55i5-8600K: 164,566i5-8600K164,566i7-7700K: 167,364i7-7700K167,364i7-6700K: 175,439i7-6700K175,439i7-4790K: 176,008i7-4790K176,008Ryzen 3 3100: 178,347Ryzen 3 3100178,347i7-4770K: 186,468i7-4770K186,468i7-3770K: 195,174i7-3770K195,174Ryzen 5 1500X: 198,092Ryzen 5 1500X198,092i7-2600K: 213,481i7-2600K213,481Ryzen 5 1400: 225Ryzen 5 1400225FX-8150: 237,491FX-8150237,4910261

I za kraj stari dobri wPrime 32M test u kojem je 10850K pokazao zube i pobjegao dalje od 5800X, te su mu performanse vrlo bliske HEDT procesoru iz 2016. godine – i7-6950X.

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

Stranica 3 od 6

OGLAS