Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 3 od 5

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL testovi

3DMark CPU profileRyzen 9 9950X17.833,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K17.304,0Ryzen 9 7950X16.956,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D16.603,0Core i9-13900K16.373,0Core i9-14900K16.362,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D15.118,0Core i7-14700K14.381,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus14.237,0Ryzen 9 9900X13.734,0Ryzen 9 7900X13.296,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K12.589,0Ryzen 9 5950X12.119,0Core i9-12900K12.034,0Ryzen 7 5800X11.985,0Ryzen 7 9800X3D10.211,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D10.090,0Ryzen 7 9700X9.403,0Ryzen 7 7700X9.058,0Core i5-12600K8.235,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D8.060,0Ryzen 7 5700X7.867,0Ryzen 5 9600X7.724,0Ryzen 5 7600X7.429,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D5.626,0Ryzen 5 5600X5.390,0Core i3-12100F4.078,0019.616

Novi Core Ultra 5 250K Plus se smjestio ti ispod Core i7 14700K procesora u ovom testu što je impresivan rezultat ako znamo da i tak procesor ima 8P+12E konfiguraciju, ali s tim da P jezgre podržavaju i Hyper Threading pa je procesor u stanju odraditi 28 threadova paralelno. Uz to, brži je i od Ryzena 9 9900X koji podešava 24 threada. Impresivan rezultat začinjen je i podatkom kako je 250K Plus od 245K brži za oko 13%.

CPU testovi

7-Zip

7-Zip Total rating (MIPS)Ryzen 9 9950X3D166.971,0Ryzen 9 9950X161.247,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K142.308,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus111.272,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D103.847,0Ryzen 7 9800X3D99.814,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K89.307,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D66.349,00183.668

u 7-Zipu je 250K Plus brži čak za oko 24% od 245K! No, ovdje je tek malo brži od Ryzena 7 9850X3D, koji podržava 16 threadova.

Blender

Blender Gooseberry benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 9950X246,3Ryzen 9 9950X3D250,8Ryzen 9 7950X266,2Ryzen 9 7950X3D276,8Core i9-13900K290,4Core i9-14900K292,9Intel Core Ultra 9 285K298,8Core i7-14700K317,8Ryzen 9 9900X322,4Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus422,4Ryzen 7 9850X3D444,1Ryzen 7 9800X3D449,4Ryzen 7 9700X504,7Ryzen 7 7800X3D527,3Ryzen 7 7700X527,3Intel Core Ultra 5 245K535,5Ryzen 5 9600X661,9Ryzen 5 7500X3D777,20855

Blender opet donosi vrijeme tek malo brže od 9850X3D, ali i za 21% brže od 245K.

Cinebench R24

Cinebench 24 nTIntel Core Ultra 9 285K2.452,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D2.266,0Ryzen 9 9950X2.225,0Ryzen 7 7950X2.131,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus1.791,0Ryzen 9 9900X1.748,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K1.450,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D1.334,0Ryzen 7 9800X3D1.309,0Ryzen 7 9700X1.157,0Ryzen 7 8700G1.061,0Ryzen 5 9600X929,0Ryzen 5 8600G801,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D754,002.697 Cinebench 24 1TRyzen 7 9850X3D141,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K140,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus137,0Ryzen 9 9950X134,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K133,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D132,0Ryzen 7 9800X3D132,0Ryzen 7 9700X131,0Ryzen 9 9900X130,0Ryzen 5 9600X128,0Ryzen 7 7950X122,0Ryzen 7 8700G109,0Ryzen 5 8600G106,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D103,00155

U Cinebenchu R24 je 250K Plus opet malo nadmašio 9900X što je impresivan rezultat, a od 245K je brži za oko 23,5% u nT testu. U single core testu je brži za oko 3% što je rezultat više frekvencije.

Cinebench R26

Cinebench 26 nTRyzen 9 9950X3D9.822,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus7.386,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K5.672,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D5.408,0010.804 Cinebench 26 1TIntel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus569,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K512,00626

Ovdje je multithreaded test 250K Plus odradio za čak 30% bolje nego 245K – impresivno.

Geekbench AI

Geekbench AI (ONNX quantized score)Ryzen 7 9850X3D14.787,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus11.721,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D11.590,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K9.359,0Ryzen 7 9800X3D8.571,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D8.370,0Ryzen 9 9950X8.309,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K7.398,0i9-12900K4.883,0016.266 Geekbench AI (OpenVINO quantized score)Ryzen 7 9850X3D33.483,0Ryzen 7 9800X3D30.086,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D28.558,0Ryzen 9 9950X24.581,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K14.890,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D14.327,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus14.059,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K NPU13.003,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K CPU12.199,0036.831

ONNX test je 250K Plus odradio besprijekorno (25% brži), ali je zato malo podbacio u OpenVINO testu i postigao “samo” 15% bolji rezultat od 245K. U oba ova testa 9850X3D dominira!

Handbrake transcode 4K to 1080p

HandbrakeIntel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus126,4Intel Core Ultra 9 285K108,9Intel Core Ultra 5 245K98,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D94,6Core i9-13900K89,9Core i9-14900K83,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D83,0Ryzen 9 7950X82,1Ryzen 9 9950X80,1Ryzen 9 7950X3D79,9Core i7-14700K79,5Ryzen 9 7900X77,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D76,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D74,4Ryzen 9 9900X74,0Ryzen 7 9800X3D71,9Ryzen 7 7700X64,2Ryzen 9 7900X61,3Ryzen 9 5950X57,2Ryzen 5 7600X57,0Ryzen 5 9600X52,7Ryzen 7 5800X49,4Core i9-10850K49,2Ryzen 7 5700X43,9Ryzen 5 5600X38,6Core i9-12900K35,3Core i3-12100F32,3Core i5-12600K18,40139

Vraćamo se na teren Intel procesora i vidimo da je ovdje 250K Plus dominantan!

JetStream 2

JetStream 2 benchmark (Firefox score,više je bolje)Ryzen 7 9850X3D367,4Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus344,8Ryzen 9 9950X316,9Ryzen 9 9950X3D312,1Ryzen 7 9800X3D288,5Intel Core Ultra 5 245K281,4Intel Core Ultra 9 285K277,2Ryzen 5 7500X3D262,40404

Ovaj JavaScript i Web Assembly test voli viši takt pa ne čudi da su 9850X3D i 250K Plus ovdje na vrhu.

V-Ray

V-Ray Benchmark 6.00.01 (vsamples)Ryzen 9 9950X52.202,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D49.814,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K43.756,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus32.125,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D28.459,0Ryzen 7 9800X3D27.739,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K24.875,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D14.005,0057.422

Za kraj dolazi V-Ray test osigurava 26% bolji rezultat od 245K, a nadmašuje i 9850X3D.