Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 4 od 5

Rezultati testiranja – drugi dio

Grafičke performanse w. Radeon RX 7900 XT @ 1.920 x 1.080

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077 (High)Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus198,1Intel Core Ultra 5 245K179,3Ryzen 9 7950X178,3Ryzen 7 9850X3D176,9Core i9-13900K176,2Ryzen 9 9950X176,0AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D175,4Intel Core Ultra 9 285K174,9Ryzen 9 9900X174,2Ryzen 7 9700X172,8Ryzen 7 7700X170,7Ryzen 5 9600X169,6Core i9-14900K169,2Core i7-14700K167,0166,20218

F1 25

F1 25 (Ultra Max)Ryzen 9 9950X3D280,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D278,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K238,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus220,00308

Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultra Quality)AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D229,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D227,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D225,0Ryzen 7 7700X224,0Ryzen 7 9700X222,0Ryzen 9 9950X221,0Ryzen 5 9600X219,0Ryzen 9 9900X215,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K210,0Core i9-13900K209,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus198,0Core i9-14900K193,0Core i7-14700K192,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K190,00252

The Calisto Protocol

The Calisto Protocol (High)Ryzen 9 9950X3D173,6Ryzen 7 9850X3D171,5AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D169,7Ryzen 5 9600X169,3Ryzen 9 9950X169,3Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus169,1Ryzen 7 9700X168,7Intel Core Ultra 9 285K168,3Ryzen 9 7950X167,9Ryzen 9 9900X167,6Ryzen 7 7700X165,9Intel Core Ultra 5 245K165,1Core i9-13900K155,1Core i7-14700K146,2Core i9-14900K141,40191

Zanimljivo je vidjeti koliko performanse osciliraju. U Cyberpunku je 250K Plus postigao apsolutno najbolji rezultat, da bi onda već u sljedećem naslovu bio sporiji i od 245K. Ove rezultate smo provjeravali nekoliko puta i uvijek su bili isti. U druga je dva naslova 250K Plus bio brži od 245K, no i dalje nedovoljno brži da bi ugrozio AMD-ove procesore.

Grafičke performanse w. GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF

3DMark

Time Spy ExtremeRyzen 7 9850X3D16.350,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus16.321,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D16.316,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D16.290,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K16.231,0017.985

Grafički rezultat je ovdje podjednak i ne varira previše od procesora do procesora.

Assetto Corsa Rally

Assetto Corsa Rally (Ultra)Intel Core Ultra 5 245K135,6Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus132,10149 Assetto Corsa Rally (Ultra)Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus111,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K110,20122 Assetto Corsa Rally (Ultra)Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus75,9Intel Core Ultra 5 245K75,1083

Zanimljivo, ali u nižoj rezoluciji je čak 245K u vodstvu, no razlike nisu velike. Ovaj ćemo graf popuniti i s AMD-ovim procesorima u budućnosti.

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077 (High)Ryzen 9 9950X3D219,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D218,1Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus209,2Ryzen 5 7500X3D206,4Ryzen 9 9950X199,4Intel Core Ultra 5 245K197,70241 Cyberpunk 2077 (High)Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus156,7Intel Core Ultra 5 245K153,9Ryzen 9 9950X3D153,3Ryzen 7 9850X3D151,6Ryzen 9 9950X151,5AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D147,90172 Cyberpunk 2077 (High)Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus76,6Intel Core Ultra 5 245K74,9AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D74,3Ryzen 7 9850X3D74,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D73,8Ryzen 9 9950X71,6084

Cyberpunk je uvijek odlično mjerilo CPU performansi u nižoj rezoluciji, a ovdje vidimo kako su tu X3D procesori u prednosti. 250K Plus ostvaruje dobru prednost nad 245K ali ipak nije dovoljno za primat u 1080p. Ipak, u više dvije rezolucije je nadmoćan.

F1 25

F1 25 (Ultra Max)Ryzen 9 9950X3D346,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D340,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus245,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K217,00381 F1 25 (Ultra Max)Ryzen 9 9950X3D268,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D265,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus231,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K210,00295 F1 25 (Ultra Max)Ryzen 9 9950X3D167,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D165,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus160,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K153,00184

Baš kao i s Radeon karticom i s GeForce je 250K Plus u nemogućnosti držati korak u ovom naslovu s Ryzenima. No, određeni napredak je svakako vidljiv u odnosu na 245K.

Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultra Quality)Ryzen 7 9850X3D286,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D281,0Ryzen 9 9950X254,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D236,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus229,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K212,00315 Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultra Quality)Ryzen 9 9950X3D245,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D244,0Ryzen 9 9950X234,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus217,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D214,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K208,00270 Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultra Quality)Ryzen 9 9950X3D143,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D142,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus138,0Ryzen 9 9950X137,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K131,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D126,00157

Ni u ovom naslovu oped 250K Plus ne može dostići jače Ryzene, ali opet pokazuje solidan porast performansi u odnosu na 245K.

S.T.A.L.K.E.R 2: Heart of Chernobyl

Heart of Chernobyl (Ultra Quality)Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus108,7Ryzen 7 9850X3D106,1Ryzen 9 9950X3D105,8Ryzen 9 9950X101,6AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D100,1Intel Core Ultra 5 245K96,60120 Heart of Chernobyl (Ultra Quality)Ryzen 7 9850X3D90,5Intel Core Ultra 5 245K87,6Ryzen 5 7500X3D86,1Ryzen 9 9950X85,5Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus85,2Ryzen 9 9950X3D82,70100 Heart of Chernobyl (Ultra Quality)Intel Core Ultra 5 245K54,0Ryzen 5 7500X3D53,6Ryzen 9 9950X3D51,3Ryzen 9 9950X51,2Ryzen 7 9850X3D50,9Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus49,1059

U nižoj je rezoluciji 250K Plus na samom vrhu poretka, dok u više dvije ipak pada na začelje, čak i unatoč činjenici što je na 4K 245K najbrži – zanimljivo!

Overclocking

Blender

Blender Gooseberry benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus @ OC390,8Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus422,40465

Cinebench R26

Cinebench 26 nTIntel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus @ OC7.646,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus7.386,008.411

V-Ray

V-Ray Benchmark 6.00.01 (vsamples)Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus @ OC33.538,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus32.125,0036.892

Porast performansi kao što vidimo nije naročito sjajan te iznosi oko 3,52% u Cinebenchu, oko 4,4% u V-Rayu te najviših 7,5% u Blenderu.

Potrošnja sistema

Potrošnjai5-750092,0Ryzen 3 1200105,0Ryzen 5 1400113,0i7-6700K120,0Core i5-10500124,0Core i5-10400125,0Ryzen 3 1300X125,0Ryzen 5 1500X130,0Ryzen 5 1600132,0Ryzen 7 1700137,0i7-7700K138,0Ryzen 7 5700X138,0Ryzen 7 2700141,0Ryzen 3 3100146,0Ryzen 5 2600155,0Ryzen 7 3700X160,0Ryzen 5 3600X162,0Ryzen 7 1700X162,0Ryzen 3 3300X163,0Ryzen 5 1600X163,0i5-8600K165,0Ryzen 5 7600X3D165,0Core i5-10600K167,0Ryzen 5 2600X170,0Ryzen 7 9700X171,0Ryzen 5 5600X172,0Ryzen 7 1800X173,0Ryzen 5 9600X175,0Core i7-10700K183,0Ryzen 7 5800X183,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D190,0Ryzen 7 3800XT193,0Ryzen 9 3900X195,0i7-6950X196,0i7-8700K200,0Ryzen 7 2700X201,0i7-5820K205,0Ryzen 5 7600X206,0Ryzen 9 5900X210,0Ryzen 9 3900XT211,0i7-5930K216,0Intel Core Ultra 5 245K221,0i7-7800X225,0Ryzen 9 5950X230,0i5-12600K225,0Ryzen 9 3950X226,0Ryzen 7 7700X230,0Ryzen 7 9850X3D256,0Core Ultra 250K Plus257,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D268,0i9-10850K275,0Ryzen 7 9800X3D290,0Ryzen 9 9900X292,0Ryzen 9 7900X305,0Ryzen 9 9950X3D320,0i9-12900K325,0Ryzen 9 9950X340,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K363,0Ryzen 9 7950X370,0Core i7-14700K413,0Core i9-13900K470,0Core i9-14900K490,00539

Maksimalna potrošnja mjerena u Cinebench R23 nT testu je 257 W. Potrošnju samog procesora nismo mogli potvrditi iz ranije spomenutog razloga – ni jedan nam se program koji se povezuje sa senzorima nije htio pokrenuti. Iz tog razloga ne znamo ni detaljne maksimalne taktove na kojima jezgre i procesor rade, dok smo maksimalnu temperaturu iščitali s ekrana na matičnoj ploči. Ipak, ono što smo mogli primijetiti preko upravitelja zadataka u OS-u je kako je maksimalni takt sa svim opterecenim jezgrama 4,64 GHz, a s jednom na 5,01 GHz. Naravno, ovo treba uzeti s

Zagrijavanje @ Alphacool AIO

Temperature (Core Max)Ryzen 7 9700X63,8Intel Core Ultra 5 245K68,0Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus70,0Ryzen 5 9600X73,8AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D77,9Intel Core Ultra 9 285K86,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D86,5Ryzen 9 9900X87,2Ryzen 9 9950X3D88,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D90,0Core i7-14700K96,0Ryzen 9 7950X96,0Ryzen 7 9800X3D97,4Ryzen 7 9850X3D97,5Ryzen 9 9950X99,8Core i9-13900K100,0Core i9-14900K100,00110

Maksimalna temperatura procesora je bila samo malo viša od one 245K modela, što je i logično. Ovaj je i brži i ima više jezgara. Radni napon pri korištenju svih dostupnih jezgri je bio 1,255 V i 1,277 V. Pri opterećenju samo jedne jezgre je napon išao do maksimalnih 1,32 V.