Intel Core Ultra 9 285K recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 3 od 5

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL testovi

PCMark 10Ryzen 9 9950X10.894,0Ryzen 9 9900X10.658,0Core i9-13900K10.646,0Ryzen 7 9700X10.548,0Core i7-14700K10.486,0Ryzen 9 7950X10.409,0Ryzen 5 9600X10.308,0Ryzen 7 7700X10.125,0Core i9-14900K10.081,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K9.825,0011.983

U PCMark testu koji predstavlja uobičajeno korištenje računala su performanse najslabije od svih uspoređenih procesora. Jasno, razlike nisu velike i nećete osjetiti da vam nešto fali, no od novog flagshipa se ipak očekuju i bolje performanse nego kod prethodnika.

3DMark CPU profileRyzen 9 9950X17.833,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K17.304,0Ryzen 9 7950X16.956,0Core i9-13900K16.373,0Core i9-14900K16.362,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D15.118,0Core i7-14700K14.381,0Ryzen 9 9900X13.734,0Ryzen 9 7900X13.296,0Ryzen 9 5950X12.119,0Core i9-12900K12.034,0Ryzen 7 5800X11.985,0Ryzen 7 9700X9.403,0Ryzen 7 7700X9.058,0Core i5-12600K8.235,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D8.060,0Ryzen 7 5700X7.867,0Ryzen 5 9600X7.724,0Ryzen 5 7600X7.429,0Ryzen 5 5600X5.390,0Core i3-12100F4.078,0019.616

U ovom prvom testu čistih x86 performansi 285K procesor ipak pokazuje zube i samo je malo slabiji od 9950X procesora koji ima 32 threada, te za oko 6% bolji od 13900K  i 14900K procesora.

Procyon AI Computer Vision (MS Windows ML; float32)Ryzen 9 9950X228,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K227,0Ryzen 9 9900X192,0Ryzen 7 9700X181,0Ryzen 5 9600X150,0Ryzen 7 7700X115,00251 Procyon AI Computer Vision (Intel OpenVINO; float32)Intel Core Ultra 9 285K259,00285

Performanse AI testova su solidne i u Windows ML testu su 9950X i 285K podjednaki. Inference uređaj je u oba slučaja bio CPU. NPU nismo mogli koristiti.

CPU testovi

AIDA64

CPU CheckMate (MP/s)Ryzen 9 9950X23.431,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K8.236,0025.774 CPU PhotoWorxx (MPixel/s)Intel Core Ultra 9 285K64.101,0Ryzen 9 9950X47.741,0070.511 CPU ZLib (MB/s)Ryzen 9 9950X2.826,5Intel Core Ultra 9 285K2.387,403.109 CPU AES (MB/s)Ryzen 9 9950X751.312,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K253.026,00826.443 CPU SHA 3 (MB/s)Ryzen 9 9950X11.590,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K9.651,0012.749 FPU Julia (Score)Ryzen 9 9950X426.713,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K197.422,00469.384 FPU Mandel (Score)Ryzen 9 9950X215.199,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K103.276,00236.719 FPU Sin Julia (Score)Ryzen 9 9950X35.588,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K14.733,0039.147 FP32 Ray-Trace (KRay/s)Ryzen 9 9950X93.110,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K37.853,00102.421 FP64 Ray-Trace (KRay/s)Ryzen 9 9950X49.666,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K20.294,0054.633

AIDA-ine testove mahom predvodi 9950X, u nekima je jako velika razlika, a jedini u kojem pobjeđuje Intelov novi procesor je PhotoWorxx..

7-Zip

7-Zip Total rating (MIPS)Ryzen 9 9950X161.247,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K142.308,00177.372

7-Zipov test smo jedno vrijeme izbacili no vraćamo ga jer je zanimljivo vidjeti usporedbu performansi kompresije i dekompresije podataka dvaju flagship procesora današnjice. Ryzen kao što vidimo i ovdje ima prednost.

Blender

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Intel Core Ultra 9 285K52,1Ryzen 9 9950X52,5Core i9-14900K59,9Core i9-13900K62,8Ryzen 9 7950X64,1Ryzen 9 7950X3D67,3Ryzen 9 9900X67,2Core i7-14700K68,2Ryzen 9 7900X81,6Core i9-12900K88,7Ryzen 7 9700X110,2Ryzen 9 5950X116,5Ryzen 9 3950X121,8Ryzen 7 7700X123,9Ryzen 7 7800X3D127,2Ryzen 5 9600X135,2Core i5-12600K139,7Ryzen 9 5900X143,1Ryzen 5 7600X155,6Ryzen 9 3900XT156,6Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Core i9-10850K172,3Ryzen 7 5700X188,4Ryzen 7 5800X201,4Ryzen 7 3800XT202,4Core i7-10700K218,4Ryzen R7 3700X233,0Ryzen 7 2700X264,8Ryzen 5 5600X271,9i7-8700K283,4Core i3-12100F285,9Ryzen 7 1800X299,6Ryzen 7 2700301,5Core i5-10600K301,7Ryzen 5 3600X313,0Core i5-10400343,0Ryzen 5 2600X344,8i7-7800X355,1Core i5-10500357,5Ryzen 5 2600366,7i5-8600K406,60447 Blender Gooseberry benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 9950X246,3Ryzen 9 7950X266,2Ryzen 9 7950X3D276,8Core i9-13900K290,4Core i9-14900K292,9Intel Core Ultra 9 285K298,8Core i7-14700K317,8Ryzen 9 9900X322,4Ryzen 7 9700X504,7Ryzen 7 7800X3D527,3Ryzen 7 7700X527,3Ryzen 5 9600X661,90728

U prvom je testu 285K najbrži što je impresivno pored 9950X procesora, no u drugom je potpuno podbacio i rezultat je lošiji od 13900K/14900K “braće”.

Cinebench R23

Cinebench 23 nTIntel Core Ultra 9 285K42.768,0Ryzen 9 9950X41.852,0Core i9-14900K39.314,0Intel i9-13900K39.223,0Ryzen 9 7950X37.776,0Core i7-14700K35.505,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D35.139,0Ryzen 9 9900X32.839,0Ryzen 9 7900X29.303,0Core i9-12900K27.259,0Ryzen 9 5950X23.653,0Ryzen 7 9700X20.536,0Ryzen 7 7700X19.459,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D18.381,0Core i5-12600K17.491,0Ryzen 5 9600X16.236,0Ryzen 5 7600X15.409,0Ryzen 7 5800X15.349,0Core i9-10850K15.175,0Ryzen 7 5700X12.652,0Ryzen 5 5600X10.218,0Core i3-12100F8.490,0047.045 Cinebench 23 1TIntel Core Ultra 9 285K2.390,0Core i9-14900K2.306,0Intel i9-13900K2.246,0Core i7-14700K2.187,0Ryzen 9 9950X2.179,0Ryzen 9 9900X2.154,0Ryzen 7 9700X2.134,0Ryzen 9 7950X2.030,0Ryzen 9 7900X2.015,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D2.002,0Ryzen 5 9600X2.001,0Core i9-12900K1.988,0Ryzen 5 7600X1.954,0Ryzen 7 7700X1.951,0Core i5-12600K1.861,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D1.820,0Ryzen 7 5800X1.596,0Ryzen 9 5950X1.583,0Core i3-12100F1.582,0Ryzen 5 5600X1.529,0Ryzen 7 5700X1.443,0Core i9-10850K1.278,002.629

U Cinebench 23 testovima je procesor pokazao zube i brži je od svih uspoređenih. Moramo priznati kako nismo očekivali da će biti brži od 9950X no je! CB23 koristimo i za 30-minutni test potrošnje i stabilnosti performansi i zadnji rezultat nakon 30 minuta je bio 42172 što je samo manji pad u odnosu na početni.

Cinebench R24

Cinebench 24 nTIntel Core Ultra 9 285K2.452,0Ryzen 9 9950X2.225,0Ryzen 7 7950X2.131,0Ryzen 9 9900X1.748,0Ryzen 7 9700X1.157,0Ryzen 7 8700G1.061,0Ryzen 5 9600X929,0Ryzen 5 8600G801,002.697 Cinebench 24 1TIntel Core Ultra 9 285K140,0Ryzen 9 9950X134,0Ryzen 7 9700X131,0Ryzen 9 9900X130,0Ryzen 5 9600X128,0Ryzen 7 7950X122,0Ryzen 7 8700G109,0Ryzen 5 8600G106,00154

Novi Cinebench i opet je 285K na vrhu. 10% je brži u nT testu od 9950X, te 4,5% u 1T testu.

Corona 1.3

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 9950X33,0Core i9-13900K36,0Core i9-14900K36,0Ryzen 9 7950X36,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D37,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K39,0Core i7-14700K41,0Ryzen 9 9900X44,0Ryzen 9 5950X47,0Ryzen 9 7900X47,0Ryzen 9 5900X58,0Core i9-12900K59,0Ryzen 9 3950X61,0Ryzen 9 7900X69,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D71,0Ryzen 7 7700X72,0Ryzen 9 3900X72,0Ryzen 9 3900XT72,0Core i9-10850K76,0Core i5-12600K90,0Ryzen 5 7600X90,0Ryzen 5 9600X91,0Ryzen 7 5800X92,0Core i7-10700K96,0Ryzen 7 5700X101,0Ryzen 7 3800XT104,0Ryzen 7 3700X112,0Ryzen 7 2700X118,0Ryzen 5 5600X123,0Core i5-10600K134,0Core i7-8700K141,0Ryzen 5 3600X144,0Core i5-10500146,0Core i5-10400148,0Core i3-12100F172,0Ryzen 3 3300X202,0Ryzen 3 3100233,00256

Ovdje novi procesor ne briljira, i sporiji je nešto od 14900K.

Geekbench AI

Geekbench AI (ONNX quantized score)Ryzen 9 9950X8.309,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K7.398,0i9-12900K4.883,009.140 Geekbench AI (OpenVINO quantized score)Ryzen 9 9950X24.581,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K14.890,0027.039

Geekbench pokazuje solidne AI performanse u oba slučaja, ali 9950X ipak pokazuje svoju nadmoć.

Handbrake transcode 4K to 1080p

HandbrakeIntel Core Ultra 9 285K108,9Core i9-13900K89,9Core i9-14900K83,0Ryzen 9 7950X82,1Ryzen 9 9950X80,1Ryzen 9 7950X3D79,9Core i7-14700K79,5Ryzen 9 7900X77,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D74,4Ryzen 9 9900X74,0Ryzen 7 7700X64,2Ryzen 9 7900X61,3Ryzen 9 5950X57,2Ryzen 5 7600X57,0Ryzen 5 9600X52,7Ryzen 7 5800X49,4Core i9-10850K49,2Ryzen 7 5700X43,9Ryzen 5 5600X38,6Core i9-12900K35,3Core i3-12100F32,3Core i5-12600K18,40120

Baš kao što je i obećano, transkodiranje je znatno ubrzano i 285K procesor ovdje debelo nadmašuje i konkurente i prethodnike.

JetStream 2

JetStream 2 benchmark (Microsoft Edge score,više je bolje)Intel Core Ultra 9 285K475,7384,60523 JetStream 2 benchmark (Firefox score,više je bolje)Intel Core Ultra 9 285K316,9277,20349

JetStream 2 kombinira JavaScript i Web Assembly benchmarke koji pokrivaju različite napredne poslove i tehnike programiranja te izbacuje rezultat na temelju toga. Vidimo da je rezultat različit u različitim browserima, ali Ryzen 9 9950X je ovdje vladar kako god okrenemo.

V-Ray

V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.03 (ksamples)Ryzen 9 9950X48.191,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K44.546,0Ryzen 9 7950X42.556,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D41.732,0Core i9-13900K41.715,0Ryzen 9 7900X39.819,0Core i9-14900K38.968,0Ryzen 9 9900X36.889,0Core i7-14700K35.889,0Core i9-12900K27.559,0Ryzen 9 5950X27.384,0Ryzen 7 9700X24.472,0Ryzen 7 7700X22.117,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D22.050,0Ryzen 5 9600X19.121,0Ryzen 5 7600X17.582,0Core i5-12600K17.516,0Ryzen 7 5800X17.040,0Core i9-10850K16.808,0Ryzen 7 5700X14.436,0Ryzen 5 5600X11.589,0Core i3-12100F9.400,0053.010 V-Ray Benchmark 6.00.01 (vsamples)Ryzen 9 9950X52.202,0Intel Core Ultra 9 285K43.756,0057.422

U starijem V-Rayu nije uspio nadmašiti 9950X procesor, ali je napredak u odnosu na stariju generaciju solidan (oko 7% je brži od 13900K). U novijem je V-Ray testu 9950X još povećao svoju prednost.