OGLAS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 4 od 5

Rezultati testiranja – drugi dio

Overclocking

Blender

Blender Gooseberry benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)285K @ OC: 292,64285K @ OC292,64285K @ Stock: 298,82285K @ Stock298,820329

Cinebench R23

Cinebench 23 nT285K @ OC: 43.881285K @ OC43.881285K @ Stock: 42.768285K @ Stock42.768048.269

Cinebench R24

Cinebench 24 nT285K @ OC: 2.537285K @ OC2.537285K @ Stock: 2.452285K @ Stock2.45202.791

V-Ray 6

V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.03 (ksamples)285K @ OC: 45.415285K @ OC45.415285K @ Stock: 43.756285K @ Stock43.756049.957

Overclocking je donio malene pomake u performansama i možda postoji još prostora za napredak, no to ostavljamo za testove pojedinih ploča.

Grafičke performanse w. Radeon RX 7900 XT @ 1.920 x 1.080

COH3

Company of Heroes 3 (Maximum details, average FPS)Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 252,43Intel Core Ultra 9 285K252,43Ryzen 9 9950X: 251,49Ryzen 9 9950X251,49Ryzen 9900X: 241,93Ryzen 9900X241,930278
Company of Heroes 3 (Maximum details, 1% low FPS)Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 130,53Intel Core Ultra 9 285K130,53Ryzen 9900X: 127,53Ryzen 9900X127,53Ryzen 9 9950X: 113,06Ryzen 9 9950X113,060144

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077 (High)Ryzen 9 7950X: 178,27Ryzen 9 7950X178,27Core i9-13900K: 176,02Core i9-13900K176,02Ryzen 9 9950X: 175,39Ryzen 9 9950X175,39Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 174,22Intel Core Ultra 9 285K174,22Ryzen 9 9900X: 172,79Ryzen 9 9900X172,79Ryzen 7 9700X: 170,71Ryzen 7 9700X170,71Ryzen 7 7700X: 169,61Ryzen 7 7700X169,61Ryzen 5 9600X: 169,16Ryzen 5 9600X169,16Core i9-14900K: 166,97Core i9-14900K166,97Core i7-14700K: 166,22Core i7-14700K166,220196

F1 22

F1 22 (Ultra)Ryzen 7 9700X: 402Ryzen 7 9700X402Ryzen 9 7950X: 402Ryzen 9 7950X402Ryzen 9 9950X: 402Ryzen 9 9950X402Ryzen 5 9600X: 400Ryzen 5 9600X400Ryzen 7 7700X: 399Ryzen 7 7700X399Ryzen 9 9900X: 396Ryzen 9 9900X396Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 396Intel Core Ultra 9 285K396Core i9-14900K: 395Core i9-14900K395Core i7-14700K: 394Core i7-14700K394Core i9-13900K: 393Core i9-13900K3930442

Godfall

Godfall (Epic)Core i9-13900K: 330,2Core i9-13900K330,2Core i9-14900K: 313,5Core i9-14900K313,5Core i7-14700K: 312,5Core i7-14700K312,5Ryzen 9 9900X: 266Ryzen 9 9900X266Ryzen 9 9950X: 265,2Ryzen 9 9950X265,2Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 264,8Intel Core Ultra 9 285K264,8Ryzen 9 7950X: 264,6Ryzen 9 7950X264,6Ryzen 7 9700X: 263,5Ryzen 7 9700X263,5Ryzen 5 9600X: 263,4Ryzen 5 9600X263,4Ryzen 7 7700X: 260,1Ryzen 7 7700X260,10363

Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultra Quality)Ryzen 7 7700X: 224Ryzen 7 7700X224Ryzen 7 9700X: 222Ryzen 7 9700X222Ryzen 9 9950X: 221Ryzen 9 9950X221Ryzen 5 9600X: 219Ryzen 5 9600X219Ryzen 9 9900X: 215Ryzen 9 9900X215Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 210Intel Core Ultra 9 285K210Core i9-13900K: 209Core i9-13900K209Core i9-14900K: 193Core i9-14900K193Core i7-14700K: 192Core i7-14700K1920246

The Calisto Protocol

The Calisto Protocol (High)Ryzen 5 9600X: 169,3Ryzen 5 9600X169,3Ryzen 9 9950X: 169,28Ryzen 9 9950X169,28Ryzen 7 9700X: 168,69Ryzen 7 9700X168,69Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 168,33Intel Core Ultra 9 285K168,33Ryzen 9 7950X: 167,86Ryzen 9 7950X167,86Ryzen 9 9900X: 167,61Ryzen 9 9900X167,61Ryzen 7 7700X: 165,86Ryzen 7 7700X165,86Core i9-13900K: 155,06Core i9-13900K155,06Core i7-14700K: 146,24Core i7-14700K146,24Core i9-14900K: 141,41Core i9-14900K141,410186

Prema očekivanjima i najavama iz Intela, igraće performanse nisu puno drugačije od prethodnih generacija što ovi testovi i pokazuju. Jedino gdje su starije generacije zasjale je bio Godfall, a novi procesor to ne može pratiti i u rangu je s AMD procesorima.

Zanimljivo za primijetiti su 1% Low performanse u COH-u 3 gdje je 9950X dosta slabiji od dva uspoređena procesora, što možda ima i veze s načinom raspodjele i brzini pristupa jezgrama.

Potrošnja sistema

Potrošnjai5-7500: 92i5-750092Ryzen 3 1200: 105Ryzen 3 1200105Ryzen 5 1400: 113Ryzen 5 1400113i7-6700K: 120i7-6700K120Core i5-10500: 124Core i5-10500124Core i5-10400: 125Core i5-10400125Ryzen 3 1300X: 125Ryzen 3 1300X125Ryzen 5 1500X: 130Ryzen 5 1500X130Ryzen 5 1600: 132Ryzen 5 1600132Ryzen 7 1700: 137Ryzen 7 1700137i7-7700K: 138i7-7700K138Ryzen 7 5700X: 138Ryzen 7 5700X138Ryzen 7 2700: 141Ryzen 7 2700141Ryzen 3 3100: 146Ryzen 3 3100146Ryzen 5 2600: 155Ryzen 5 2600155Ryzen 7 3700X: 160Ryzen 7 3700X160Ryzen 5 3600X: 162Ryzen 5 3600X162Ryzen 7 1700X: 162Ryzen 7 1700X162Ryzen 3 3300X: 163Ryzen 3 3300X163Ryzen 5 1600X: 163Ryzen 5 1600X163i5-8600K: 165i5-8600K165Core i5-10600K: 167Core i5-10600K167Ryzen 5 2600X: 170Ryzen 5 2600X170Ryzen 7 9700X: 171Ryzen 7 9700X171Ryzen 5 5600X: 172Ryzen 5 5600X172Ryzen 7 1800X: 173Ryzen 7 1800X173Ryzen 5 9600X: 175Ryzen 5 9600X175Core i7-10700K: 183Core i7-10700K183Ryzen 7 5800X: 183Ryzen 7 5800X183Ryzen 7 7800X3D: 190Ryzen 7 7800X3D190Ryzen 7 3800XT: 193Ryzen 7 3800XT193Ryzen 9 3900X: 195Ryzen 9 3900X195i7-6950X: 196i7-6950X196i7-8700K: 200i7-8700K200Ryzen 7 2700X: 201Ryzen 7 2700X201i7-5820K: 205i7-5820K205Ryzen 5 7600X: 206Ryzen 5 7600X206Ryzen 9 5900X: 210Ryzen 9 5900X210Ryzen 9 3900XT: 211Ryzen 9 3900XT211i7-5930K: 216i7-5930K216i7-7800X: 225i7-7800X225Ryzen 9 5950X: 230Ryzen 9 5950X230i5-12600K: 225i5-12600K225Ryzen 9 3950X: 226Ryzen 9 3950X226Ryzen 7 7700X: 230Ryzen 7 7700X230Ryzen 9 7950X3D: 268Ryzen 9 7950X3D268i9-10850K: 275i9-10850K275Ryzen 9 9900X: 292Ryzen 9 9900X292Ryzen 9 7900X: 305Ryzen 9 7900X305i9-12900K: 325i9-12900K325Ryzen 9 9950X: 340Ryzen 9 9950X340Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 363Intel Core Ultra 9 285K363Ryzen 9 7950X: 370Ryzen 9 7950X370Core i7-14700K: 413Core i7-14700K413Core i9-13900K: 470Core i9-13900K470Core i9-14900K: 490Core i9-14900K4900539

Maksimalna potrošnja mjerena u Cinebench R23 nT testu je drastično pala u odnosu na Intelov sistem – čak za 127 W u odnosu na 14900K, od kojega je i brži u tom testu. Arrow Lake tako potvrđuje Intelove navode o efikasnosti, no isto tako, samo su ulovili AMD čiji flagship troši i manje. Sam procesor na maksimumu troši oko 242 W na Hero ploči prema podacima koje vidimo iz HWiNFO loga, što je tik manje od maksimalnog TDP-a.

Zagrijavanje @ LT360 HPE

Temperature (Core Max)Ryzen 7 9700X: 63,8Ryzen 7 9700X63,8Ryzen 5 9600X: 73,8Ryzen 5 9600X73,8Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 86Intel Core Ultra 9 285K86Ryzen 7 7800X3D: 86,5Ryzen 7 7800X3D86,5Ryzen 9 9900X: 87,2Ryzen 9 9900X87,2Ryzen 9 7950X3D: 90Ryzen 9 7950X3D90Core i7-14700K: 96Core i7-14700K96Ryzen 9 7950X: 96Ryzen 9 7950X96Ryzen 9 9950X: 99,8Ryzen 9 9950X99,8Core i9-13900K: 100Core i9-13900K100Core i9-14900K: 100Core i9-14900K1000110

Maksimalna temperatura na jednoj P jezgri je 86°C, no prosječne su temperature nešto niže pa je CPU package temperatura u prosjeku iznosila 79°C pri prosječnoj CPU Package potrošnji od 228,96 W. Radni napon je u prosjeku oko 1,397 V, a prosječna struja je 152 A. Jasno je kako će gotovo svaki bolji hladnjak koji ima TDP hlađenja od oko 250 W na više bez problema izvući maksimum performansi iz ovoga procesora. Zanimljiv podatak je i kako je prosječna frekvencija P-jezgri bila 5,2-5,3 GHz, a E-jezgri oko 4,6 GHz. To je ujedno i maksimum na kojoj jezgre rade pod bilo kojim nT opterećenjem.

Rezultati testiranja – drugi dio

Stranica 4 od 5

OGLAS