SPECviewperf 7.1
SPECviewperf 7,1
|
 |
| 3dsmax-02 |
| Athlon 64 3200+ |
| 15,9 |
 |
|
|
| P4EE 3200/800/400 |
| 15,88 |
|
|
|
| P4C 3200/800/400 |
| 15,82 |
|
|
|
| Athlon 64 FX-51 |
| 12,26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
6 |
|
| |
| drv-09 |
| P4EE 3200/800/400 |
| 64,06 |
|
|
|
| P4C 3200/800/400 |
| 64,04 |
|
|
|
| Athlon 64 3200+ |
| 63,22 |
|
|
|
| Athlon 64 FX-51 |
| 47,69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 0 |
|
5 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
!
0 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
|
0 |
|
| |
| dx-08 |
| Athlon 64 3200+ |
| 57,14 |
|
|
|
| Athlon 64 FX-51 |
| 56,01 |
|
|
|
| P4EE 3200/800/400 |
| 49,7 |
|
|
|
| P4C 3200/800/400 |
| 47,7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 0 |
|
5 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
!
0 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
|
0 |
|
| |
| light-06 |
| P4EE 3200/800/400 |
| 14,45 |
|
|
|
| Athlon 64 3200+ |
| 14,39 |
|
|
|
| P4C 3200/800/400 |
| 14,26 |
|
|
|
| Athlon 64 FX-51 |
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
6 |
|
| |
| proe-02 |
| P4EE 3200/800/400 |
| 17,61 |
|
|
|
| P4C 3200/800/400 |
| 17,59 |
|
|
|
| Athlon 64 3200+ |
| 15,98 |
|
|
|
| Athlon 64 FX-51 |
| 12,65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 0 |
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
6 |
|
8 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
|
8 |
|
| |
| ugs-03 |
| P4EE 3200/800/400 |
| 9,07 |
|
|
|
| P4C 3200/800/400 |
| 8,952 |
|
|
|
| Athlon 64 FX-51 |
| 8,906 |
|
|
|
| Athlon 64 3200+ |
| 8,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
SPECviewperf 7.1 pokazuje kako platforma često igra odlučujuću ulogu. SPECviewperf
7.1 pokazuje kako Force3 150 Pro chipset nije baš napravljen kako treba (o tome
smo već pisali u našem članku o Athlon 64 / Athlon 64 FX procesorima, ali nije
loše ponoviti). Zbog chipseta tako Athlon 64 FX čami uglavnom na dnu,
dok P4 procesori dominiraju ovim testom. Čast AMD-a kolko-tolko spašava Athlon
64 3200+, najviše zbog druge platforme (VIA K8T800). Mišljenja smo da će Athlon
64 FX s nekom drugom platformom biti dominantan i u ovom testu.
