Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X & R9 280 Dual-X

· · Video · Stranica 3 od 6

Rezultati testova – prvi dio

3DMark FirestrikeSapphire R9 280X Vapor-X8.063,0MSI R9 280X7.669,0AMD HD7970 GHz7.161,0ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC7.078,0Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X6.459,0Asus GTX680 DCUII6.434,0Sapphire R9 270X Toxic6.086,0Asus Striker Platinum6.070,0Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X5.759,0ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP5.685,0Gigabyte R9 270 OC5.268,0Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X5.117,0Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X4.645,008.869

3DMark pokazuje izvrsne performanse 280X Vapor-X modela, koji malo zaostaje za 280X Toxicom, dok se 280 Dual-X smješta između dvije brze Nvidijine kartice, i iznad 270X kartica.

Bioshock InfiniteASUS GTX770 DCU II OC100,8MSI R9 280X100,4Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X96,7Asus GTX680 DCUII91,4AMD HD7970 GHz89,8ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP87,5Asus Striker Platinum83,1Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X78,2Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X75,9ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP74,8Sapphire R9 270X Toxic74,3Gigabyte R9 270 OC69,7Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X62,3Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X55,90111 Bioshock InfiniteASUS GTX770 DCU II OC80,6MSI R9 280X75,5Asus GTX680 DCUII72,9Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X72,6AMD HD7970 GHz67,4Asus Striker Platinum67,1ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP61,5Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X59,3Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X56,1ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP55,0Sapphire R9 270X Toxic54,9Gigabyte R9 270 OC51,9Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X46,8Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X42,5089

Bioshock daje nešto niže rezultate kod AMD kartica pa su tako sve pomaknute prema dolje u odnosu na druge testove. Ipak, vidimo kako je 280 očekivano iznad 270X modela, a ovo je jedini test gdje je Vapor-X malo sporiji od konkurentnog MSI-evog modela.

Company of Heroes 2Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X57,9Sapphire R9 270X Toxic52,3Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X49,4Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X43,0Asus Striker Platinum40,3064

COH2 je vrlo zahtjevna igra i u ovoj se klasi kartica obavezno mora ugasiti AA filter kako bi imali solidnu igrivost. Zanimljivo, ovdje je 270X Toxic iznad 280 kartice, dok je 280X suvereno na vrhu.