OGLAS

Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X & R9 280 Dual-X

· · Video · Stranica 4 od 6

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

Hitman AbsolutionSapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 56,49Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X56,49MSI R9 280X: 56,11MSI R9 280X56,11AMD HD7970 GHz: 55,62AMD HD7970 GHz55,62ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC: 49,38ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC49,38Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 46,6Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X46,6Asus GTX680 DCUII: 45,85Asus GTX680 DCUII45,85Sapphire R9 270X Toxic: 44,65Sapphire R9 270X Toxic44,65Gigabyte GTX580 SOC: 42,29Gigabyte GTX580 SOC42,29Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X: 42,11Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X42,11ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP: 42,06ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP42,06Asus Striker Platinum: 41,57Asus Striker Platinum41,57AMD R9 270X: 41,1AMD R9 270X41,1Gigabyte R9 270 OC: 38,95Gigabyte R9 270 OC38,95Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X: 37,98Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X37,98ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP: 34,54ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP34,54Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X: 34,39Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X34,39062

Vapor-X je tek mrvicu iznad MSI-evog 280X modela, a da smo u ovu priču još ubacili i rezultat 280X Toxica koji je po nama najbolji 280X model vidjeli bi kako Vapor-X kaska za njim oko 2 FPS-a. 280 model se pak po performansama smješta između GTX680 i GTX770 kartica, ali nije ni puno iznad brzog 270X Toxica.

ThiefSapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 51,7Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X51,7Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 44,9Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X44,9Sapphire R9 270X Toxic: 41,4Sapphire R9 270X Toxic41,4Asus Striker Platinum: 38,7Asus Striker Platinum38,7Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X: 33,4Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X33,4Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X: 30,3Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X30,3057

Thief na ovim karticama iz srednjeg razreda čak nudi i solidna ubrzanja ako koristimo Mantle, pa smo bilježili ubbrzanja od 1 do 3 FPS-a, a rezultati u tablicama su sa upaljenim Mantleom. Što se performansi tiče poredak je sasvim očekivan, pri čemu se najbolje vidi kakav je odnos snaga i koliko se zapravo isplati investirati u 280X kao nekakav minimum za dobar gaming.

Tomb RaiderSapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 62,9Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X62,9MSI R9 280X: 60,4MSI R9 280X60,4AMD HD7970 GHz: 57,7AMD HD7970 GHz57,7ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC: 56,7ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC56,7Asus GTX680 DCUII: 49,5Asus GTX680 DCUII49,5Sapphire R9 270X Toxic: 47,8Sapphire R9 270X Toxic47,8Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 45,5Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X45,5Asus GTX670 DCU Mini: 45,4Asus GTX670 DCU Mini45,4Asus Striker Platinum: 45Asus Striker Platinum45Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X: 44,4Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X44,4ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP: 43,8ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP43,8ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP: 40,9ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP40,9Gigabyte GTX580 SOC: 40,3Gigabyte GTX580 SOC40,3Gigabyte R9 270 OC: 39,8Gigabyte R9 270 OC39,8Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X: 39,7Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X39,7Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X: 33,4Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X33,4069

Zanimljivo, ali u Tomb Raideru 280 Dual -X ima slabiji rezultat od brze 270 Toxic kartice, dok je 280X Vapor-X na vrhu.

 

Overclocking

3DMarkSapphire R9 280X Vapor-X @ OC: 8.424Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X @…8.424Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 8.063Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X8.063Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ OC: 7.933Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ OC7.933Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 6.689Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X6.68909.266
Bioshock InfiniteSapphire R9 280X Vapor-X @ OC: 76,57Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X @…76,57Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 72,55Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X72,55Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ OC: 63,22Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ OC63,22Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 59,32Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X59,32084
Hitman AbsolutionSapphire R9 280X Vapor-X @ OC: 59,33Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X @…59,33Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 56,49Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X56,49Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ OC: 49,85Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ OC49,85Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 46,6Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X46,6065
Tomb RaiderSapphire R9 280X Vapor-X @ OC: 66,9Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X @…66,9Sapphire R9 280 Vapor-X: 62,9Sapphire R9 280 Vapor-X62,9Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ OC: 51,1Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ OC51,1Sapphire R9 280X Dual-X: 45,5Sapphire R9 280X Dual-X45,5074

Overclocking performanse su kod obje kartice vrlo dobre. Kod 280 Dual-X smo ipak očekivali i veći porast, no pregledom GPU-Z loga smo primjetili kako je u najzahtjevnijim naslovima kartica ipak spuštala takt GPU-a sa 1150 na oko 1037 MHz u nekim trenucima.

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

Stranica 4 od 6

OGLAS