Rezultati testova – drugi dio
Hitman Absolution Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X 56,5 MSI R9 280X 56,1 AMD HD7970 GHz 55,6 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC 49,4 XFX R9 280 Black OC 48,4 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 46,6 Asus GTX680 DCUII 45,9 Gigabyte R9 285 OC 45,6 Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC 45,5 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 44,7 Gigabyte GTX580 SOC 42,3 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X 42,1 ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP 42,1 Asus Striker Platinum 41,6 AMD R9 270X 41,1 Gigabyte R9 270 OC 39,0 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X 38,0 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP 34,5 Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X 34,4 0 62
I u Hitmanu je Sapphire nešto malo sporiji po očekivanju.
Thief Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X 51,7 XFX R9 280 Black OC 46,3 Gigabyte R9 285 OC 46,2 Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC 45,8 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 44,9 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 41,4 Asus Striker Platinum 38,7 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X 33,4 Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X 30,3 0 57
Ponovno ista situacija kao i ranije, a zanimljivo je primijetiti kako se R9 285 Dual-X ponaša u odnosu na R9 280 Dual-X kroz sve naslove – ovdje je nešto malo brža.
Tomb Raider Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X 62,9 MSI R9 280X 60,4 AMD HD7970 GHz 57,7 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC 56,7 XFX R9 280 Black OC 52,3 Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC 52,2 Gigabyte R9 285 OC 51,8 Asus GTX680 DCUII 49,5 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 47,8 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 45,5 Asus GTX670 DCU Mini 45,4 Asus Striker Platinum 45,0 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X 44,4 ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP 43,8 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP 40,9 Gigabyte GTX580 SOC 40,3 Gigabyte R9 270 OC 39,8 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X 39,7 Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X 33,4 0 69
U Tomb Radieru je 285 ponovno dosta brži od 280, a Sapphireova 285 ponovno mrvicu brža od Gigabyteove.
Overclocking
3DMark Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC @ OC 8.226,0 Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC 7.217,0 0 9.049
Bioshock Infinite Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC @ OC 79,6 Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC 72,2 0 88
Hitman Absolution Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC @ OC 51,0 Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC 45,5 0 56
Overclocking performanse su u prosjeku rasle iznad 10% što smatramo vrlo dobrim rezultatom.