Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X test

· Krešimir Matanović · Video · Stranica 5 od 6

Rezultati testova – treći dio

PotrošnjaSapphire R9 270 Dual-X320,0Gigabyte R9 285 OC321,0Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC323,0ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP330,0Sapphire R9 270X Toxic333,0Gigabyte R9 270 OC340,0Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X350,0Asus Striker Platinum358,0ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC362,0Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X370,0MSI R9 280X371,0Asus GTX680 DCUII375,0XFX R9 280 Black OC375,0AMD HD7970 GHz Edition422,0Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X425,00468

Sapphire troši mrvicu više od Gigabytea, no još jednom je potvrđeno koliko je 285 manji potrošač od 280.

TemperatureGigabyte R9 270 OC60,0Sapphire R9 270X Toxic60,0Asus GTX680 DCUII61,0MSI GTX770 Lightning62,0ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC62,0XFX R9 280 Black OC62,0Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC63,0Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X64,0Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X65,0Gigabyte R9 285 OC66,0ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP67,0Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X67,0Asus Striker Platinum67,0ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP68,0ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC68,0Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X68,0075

Sapphireov Dual-X uvijek hvalimo kao vrlo dobar hladnjak pa je i sada tako, pogotovo zbog činjenice kako kod ove kartice ima lakši zadatak nego kod 280. Overclockingom na 1140 MHz se potrošnja penje na oko 340 W.

POVEZANI ČLANCI