Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact test

· · Video · Stranica 4 od 6

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

Hitman AbsolutionSapphire R9 280X Vapor-X56,5MSI R9 280X56,1AMD HD7970 GHz55,6ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC49,4XFX R9 280 Black OC48,4Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X46,6Asus GTX680 DCUII45,9Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact45,8Gigabyte R9 285 OC45,6Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC45,5Sapphire R9 270X Toxic44,7Gigabyte GTX580 SOC42,3Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X42,1ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP42,1Asus Striker Platinum41,6AMD R9 270X41,1Gigabyte R9 270 OC39,0Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X38,0ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP34,5Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X34,4062

I u Hitmanu je Compactica nešto malo brža od ostale dvije 285, što po taktovima ne bi smjela, pa to pripisujemo poboljšanjima u Omega driveru.

ThiefSapphire R9 280X Vapor-X51,7XFX R9 280 Black OC46,3Gigabyte R9 285 OC46,2Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC45,8Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X44,9Sapphire R9 270X Toxic41,4Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact41,2Asus Striker Platinum38,7Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X33,4Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X30,3057

U Thiefu nema nikakvih poboljšanja na račun upravljačkih programa i performanse su ovdje dosta niže.

Tomb RaiderSapphire R9 280X Vapor-X62,9MSI R9 280X60,4AMD HD7970 GHz57,7ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC56,7XFX R9 280 Black OC52,3Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC52,2Gigabyte R9 285 OC51,8Asus GTX680 DCUII49,6Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact49,5Sapphire R9 270X Toxic47,8Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X45,5Asus GTX670 DCU Mini45,4Asus Striker Platinum45,0Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X44,4ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP43,8ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP40,9Gigabyte GTX580 SOC40,3Gigabyte R9 270 OC39,8Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X39,7Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X33,4069

U Tomb Radieru je Compactica tamo gdje i treba biti – ispod dvije tvornički OC-ane 285.

Sniper Elite III (1920 x 1200 @ Maximum details)Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact @ Mantle96,3Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact89,40106

I u Sniper Eliteu možemo provjeriti dobitak performansi uljučivanjem Mantlea. Kao što vidimo i ovdje je dobitak oko 8% (preciznije 7.7%).