Rezultati testova – treći dio
Overclocking
3DMark Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact @ OC 7.785,0 Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact 7.147,0 0 8.564
Hitman Absolution Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact @ OC 50,1 Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact 45,8 0 55
Sleeping Dogs Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact @ OC 44,4 Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact 41,0 0 49
Overclocking performanse su u prosjeku rasle iznad 9% što je solidan rezultat.
Potrošnja
Potrošnja Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X 320,0 Gigabyte R9 285 OC 321,0 Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC 323,0 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP 330,0 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 333,0 Gigabyte R9 270 OC 340,0 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X 350,0 Asus Striker Platinum 358,0 Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact 358,0 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC 362,0 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 370,0 MSI R9 280X 371,0 Asus GTX680 DCUII 375,0 XFX R9 280 Black OC 375,0 AMD HD7970 GHz Edition 422,0 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X 425,0 0 468
Kartica troši više nego ostale dvije 285 koje smo probali što joj baš i ne ide na čast.
Zagrijavanje
Temperature Gigabyte R9 270 OC 60,0 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 60,0 Asus GTX680 DCUII 61,0 MSI GTX770 Lightning 62,0 ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC 62,0 XFX R9 280 Black OC 62,0 Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC 63,0 Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact 64,0 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 64,0 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X 65,0 Gigabyte R9 285 OC 66,0 ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP 67,0 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X 67,0 Asus Striker Platinum 67,0 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP 68,0 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC 68,0 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X 68,0 0 75
Da je hlađenje odlično riješeno vidimo kako se GPU penje samo jedan stupanj celzijev iznad onoga na Dual-X kartici, a sve uz istu razinu buke – odlično.