OGLAS

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX & 2950X recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 6 od 9

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL (Futuremark) testovi

PCMark 10Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: 6.083Ryzen Threadripper 2950X6.083Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: 5.727Ryzen Threadripper 1920X5.727Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 5.461Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX5.46106.691

PCMark 10 mjeri općenite performanse sistema i ovdje je dosta bitan takt procesora. Softver nije prilagođen velikom broju threadova pa zapravo ne iznenađuje niži rezultat koji je 2990WX postigao. Taj procesor jednostavno nije za svakodnevne “obične” zadatke, nego za workstation primjenu, content creation i softvere koji znaju iskoristiti sve njegove threadove.

3DMark Time SpyRyzen Threadripper 2950X: 6.933Ryzen Threadripper 2950X6.933Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: 6.915Ryzen Threadripper 1920X6.915Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 6.640Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX6.64007.626
3DMark Fire StrikeRyzen Threadripper 2950X: 18.013Ryzen Threadripper 2950X18.013Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: 15.755Ryzen Threadripper 1920X15.755Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 15.706Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX15.706019.814

Ista se stvar ponavlja i u igrama, a vidimo kako visoki takt 2950X procesora odgovara grafičkim testovima. 1920X je nešto podbacio u starijem testu, u kojem 2950X jednostavno briljira.

CPU testovi

7-ZIPRyzen Threadripper 2990WX: 116.205Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX116.205Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: 108.409Ryzen Threadripper 2950X108.409Threadripper 1950X: 73.545Threadripper 1950X73.545Threadripper 1920X: 56.960Threadripper 1920X56.960i7-6950X: 50.375i7-6950X50.375Ryzen 7 2700X: 48.030Ryzen 7 2700X48.030Ryzen 7 2700: 42.859Ryzen 7 270042.859Ryzen 7 1800X: 41.197Ryzen 7 1800X41.197i7-8700K: 40.613i7-8700K40.613i7-5960X: 40.065i7-5960X40.065Ryzen 7 1700X: 39.010Ryzen 7 1700X39.010Ryzen 5 2600X: 37.676Ryzen 5 2600X37.676i7-7800X: 37.543i7-7800X37.543Ryzen 7 1700: 36.906Ryzen 7 170036.906i7-4960X: 35.921i7-4960X35.921i7-3960X: 34.371i7-3960X34.371Ryzen 5 2600: 33.967Ryzen 5 260033.967i7-5930K: 32.228i7-5930K32.228Ryzen 5 1600X: 32.093Ryzen 5 1600X32.093i7-5820K: 31.261i7-5820K31.261Ryzen 5 1600: 31.200Ryzen 5 160031.200i7-980X: 29.058i7-980X29.058i7-3930K: 28.938i7-3930K28.938i7-7700K: 28.583i7-7700K28.583i5-8600K: 28.294i5-8600K28.294i7-6700K: 26.328i7-6700K26.328i7-4790K: 26.327i7-4790K26.327i7-3770K: 24.437i7-3770K24.437i7-4770K: 23.564i7-4770K23.564Ryzen 5 1500X: 22.909Ryzen 5 1500X22.909FX-8150: 20.957FX-815020.957i7-2600K: 20.101i7-2600K20.101Ryzen 5 1400: 20.016Ryzen 5 140020.016i5-4690K: 18.528i5-4690K18.528i5-6600K: 18.155i5-6600K18.155i5-4670K: 17.203i5-4670K17.203i5-7500: 16.598i5-750016.598Ryzen 3 1300X: 14.896Ryzen 3 1300X14.896i5-2500K: 14.254i5-2500K14.254Ryzen 3 1200: 12.560Ryzen 3 120012.5600127.826

7-Zip ispravno prepoznaje sve raspoložive threadove, no ne koristi ih u potpunosti jer uvelike ovisi i o brzini pristupa jezgara memoriji. Kod 2990WX-a je on ograničen kao što znamo za dva Die elementa, tj. za pola procesora. Infinity Fabric je opterećen, nastaje “gužva” u pristupu i performanse pate. Ovako će biti u svim tetsovima koji ovise o memoriji. Oni koji ne ovise poput rendera, će biti brži.

S druge strane, 2950X ovdje ima vrlo visok rezultat koji je pomalo nerealan ako ga usporedimo s onime što je 1950X postigao. Očito je kako 7-Zip ima određenih problema s ovim novim procesorima.

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 94,94Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX94,94Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: 150,95Ryzen Threadripper 2950X150,95Threadripper 1950X: 161,33Threadripper 1950X161,33Threadripper 1920X: 197,1Threadripper 1920X197,1Ryzen 7 2700X: 264,82Ryzen 7 2700X264,82i7-8700K: 283,41i7-8700K283,41Ryzen 7 1800X: 299,64Ryzen 7 1800X299,64Ryzen 7 2700: 301,5Ryzen 7 2700301,5Ryzen 5 2600X: 344,84Ryzen 5 2600X344,84i7-7800X: 355,05i7-7800X355,05Ryzen 5 2600: 366,65Ryzen 5 2600366,65i5-8600K: 406,55i5-8600K406,550447

Po očekivanju Blender nema nikakvih problema i ovdje je 2990WX jednostavno nadmoćan. 2950X je donio solidno ubrzanje u odnosu na 1950X.

Cinebench 15Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 5.161Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX5.161Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: 3.212Ryzen Threadripper 2950X3.212Threadripper 1950X: 2.956Threadripper 1950X2.956Threadripper 1920X: 2.431Threadripper 1920X2.431i7-6950X: 1.864i7-6950X1.864Ryzen 7 2700X: 1.828Ryzen 7 2700X1.828Ryzen 7 1800X: 1.624Ryzen 7 1800X1.624Ryzen 7 2700: 1.588Ryzen 7 27001.588i7-8700K: 1.546i7-8700K1.546Ryzen 7 1700X: 1.542Ryzen 7 1700X1.542Ryzen 7 1700: 1.403Ryzen 7 17001.403i7-5960X: 1.377i7-5960X1.377Ryzen 5 2600X: 1.368Ryzen 5 2600X1.368Ryzen 5 2600: 1.301Ryzen 5 26001.301i7-7800X: 1.264i7-7800X1.264Ryzen 5 1600X: 1.241Ryzen 5 1600X1.241Ryzen 5 1600: 1.129Ryzen 5 16001.129i7-5930K: 1.101i7-5930K1.101i7-5820K: 1.074i7-5820K1.074i5-8600K: 1.030i5-8600K1.030i7-7700K: 989i7-7700K989i7-6700K: 935i7-6700K935Ryzen 5 1500X: 814Ryzen 5 1500X814Ryzen 5 1400: 703Ryzen 5 1400703i5-6600K: 651i5-6600K651i5-7500: 596i5-7500596Ryzen 3 1300X: 558Ryzen 3 1300X558Ryzen 3 1200: 482Ryzen 3 120048205.677

Cinebench također pokazuje kako zna iskoristiti sve raspoložive resurse i postignuti je rezultat za 2990WX odličan. Ponovno, porast koji je 2950X ostvario nad 1950X je vrlo dobar. Single thread rezultati su 172 cb za 2990WX i 176 cb za 2950X.

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 40Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX40Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: 60,8Ryzen Threadripper 2950X60,8Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: 91Ryzen Threadripper 1920X910100

Corona Renderer je fototrealistični renderer dostupan za Autodeskov 3ds Max ili kao standalone CLI aplikacija. Razvija se i verzija za Maxon Cinemu 4D. Dostupan je i benchmark koji automatski renderira scenu i izbacuje rezultat u sekundama, te u Rays/sec. Corona je idealan usage case scenario za 2990WX i rezultat je jasno vidljiv – za trećinu je brži od 1950X-a.

DaVinci Resolve (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 57Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX57Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: 64Ryzen Threadripper 2950X64070

DaVinci Resolve je video editor koji kombinira online i offline editiranje, color correction, audio post produkciju i vizualne efekte. Reslove bi trebao biti u stanju koristiti sve raspoložive threadove i u praksi ih i koristi, no ne svo vrijeme. To se odrazilo i na rezultat gdje vidimo kako nam je za spajanje dva 4K videa bilo potrebno 64 sekunde na 2950X koji je bio maksimalno opterećen, te samo 7 sekundi manje za 2990WX koji je tek povremeno i kratkotrajno bio opterećen do kraja.

HandbrakeRyzen Threadripper 2950X: 41,5Ryzen Threadripper 2950X41,5Threadripper 1950X: 38,3Threadripper 1950X38,3Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 36,3Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX36,3Threadripper 1920X: 35,2Threadripper 1920X35,2Ryzen 7 2700X: 27,8Ryzen 7 2700X27,8i7-8700K: 26,17i7-8700K26,17Ryzen 7 1800X: 25,6Ryzen 7 1800X25,6Ryzen 7 1700X: 24,6Ryzen 7 1700X24,6Ryzen 7 2700: 24,5Ryzen 7 270024,5Ryzen 7 1700: 22,3Ryzen 7 170022,3Ryzen 5 2600X: 21,8Ryzen 5 2600X21,8Ryzen 5 2600: 20,3Ryzen 5 260020,3i7-7800X: 19,7i7-7800X19,7Ryzen 5 1600X: 19,5Ryzen 5 1600X19,5i5-8600K: 19i5-8600K19Ryzen 5 1600: 17,5Ryzen 5 160017,5i7-5820K: 17,2i7-5820K17,2i7-7700K: 17,1i7-7700K17,1i7-6700K: 15,9i7-6700K15,9Ryzen 5 1500X: 13,1Ryzen 5 1500X13,1Ryzen 5 1400: 11,6Ryzen 5 140011,6i5-7500: 11,31i5-750011,31Ryzen 3 1300X: 10,2Ryzen 3 1300X10,2Ryzen 3 1200: 8,4Ryzen 3 12008,4046

Handbrake očito nije u stanju koristiti više od 32 threada i 2990WX procesor je bio opterećen samo polovično, pa je rezultat zbog nižeg radnog takta slabiji nego sa 2950X procesorom.

TrueCrypt v7.1Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: 20,3Ryzen Threadripper 2950X20,3Threadripper 1950X: 18,4Threadripper 1950X18,4Threadripper 1920X: 15,2Threadripper 1920X15,2Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 11,2Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX11,2Ryzen 7 2700X: 11Ryzen 7 2700X11i7-6950X: 10,5i7-6950X10,5Ryzen 7 1800X: 10,0Ryzen 7 1800X10,0Ryzen 7 1700X: 9,4Ryzen 7 1700X9,4Ryzen 7 2700: 9,2Ryzen 7 27009,2i7-8700K: 8,7i7-8700K8,7Ryzen 7 1700: 8,6Ryzen 7 17008,6i7-5960X: 8,4i7-5960X8,4Ryzen 5 2600X: 8,3Ryzen 5 2600X8,3Ryzen 5 2600: 7,7Ryzen 5 26007,7i7-7800X: 7,4i7-7800X7,4Ryzen 5 1600X: 7,3Ryzen 5 1600X7,3Ryzen 5 1600: 6,7Ryzen 5 16006,7i7-5930K: 6,6i7-5930K6,6i7-5820K: 6,3i7-5820K6,3i7-4960X: 6i7-4960X6i7-7700K: 5,6i7-7700K5,6i5-8600K: 5,5i5-8600K5,5i7-3960X: 5,4i7-3960X5,4i7-6700K: 5,2i7-6700K5,2i7-4790K: 5,2i7-4790K5,2Ryzen 5 1500X: 4,8Ryzen 5 1500X4,8i7-4770K: 4,5i7-4770K4,5Ryzen 5 1400: 4,3Ryzen 5 14004,3i5-6600K: 3,4i5-6600K3,4i5-4670K: 3,3i5-4670K3,3FX-8150: 3,3FX-81503,3i5-4690K: 3,3i5-4690K3,3i5-7500: 3,2i5-75003,2i7-3770K: 3,2i7-3770K3,2Ryzen 3 1300X: 3,1Ryzen 3 1300X3,1i5-2500K: 2,8i5-2500K2,8Ryzen 3 1200: 2,1Ryzen 3 12002,1022

Još jedan benchmark koji nije mogao iskoristit sve raspoložive threadove kod 2990WX procesora pa je rezultat slab, čak u domeni Ryzena 7 2700X.

V-Ray Benchmark 1.0.8 (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 26Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX26Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: 43Ryzen Threadripper 2950X43Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: 56Ryzen Threadripper 1920X56062

V-Ray Benchmark je proizvod ChaosGroup-a koji je stand-alone aplikacija za mjerenje performansi procesora i grafike u renderiranju. On pravilno koristi 2990WX procesor koji je postigao odličan rezultat. V-Ray je između ostalih dostupan za 3ds Max, Mayu, Cinemu 4D, Blender, SketchUp itd.

wPrime 2.0Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 31,56Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX31,56Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: 49,234Ryzen Threadripper 2950X49,234Threadripper 1950X: 54,145Threadripper 1950X54,145Threadripper 1920X: 69,205Threadripper 1920X69,205i7-6950X: 86,854i7-6950X86,854Ryzen 7 2700X: 95,624Ryzen 7 2700X95,624Ryzen 7 1800X: 103,919Ryzen 7 1800X103,919i7-8700K: 106,855i7-8700K106,855Ryzen 7 1700X: 108,265Ryzen 7 1700X108,265Ryzen 7 2700: 110,626Ryzen 7 2700110,626i7-5960X: 116,929i7-5960X116,929Ryzen 7 1700: 121,355Ryzen 7 1700121,355i7-7800X: 126,153i7-7800X126,153Ryzen 5 2600X: 126,752Ryzen 5 2600X126,752Ryzen 5 2600: 129,637Ryzen 5 2600129,637i7-4960X: 135,127i7-4960X135,127i7-3960X: 135,435i7-3960X135,435i7-5930K: 136,293i7-5930K136,293Ryzen 5 1600X: 138,705Ryzen 5 1600X138,705i7-5820K: 140,245i7-5820K140,245Ryzen 5 1600: 149,89Ryzen 5 1600149,89i7-3930K: 164,566i7-3930K164,566i5-8600K: 167,364i5-8600K167,364i7-7700K: 175,439i7-7700K175,439i7-6700K: 178,347i7-6700K178,347i7-4790K: 186,468i7-4790K186,468i7-4770K: 195,174i7-4770K195,174i7-3770K: 198,092i7-3770K198,092Ryzen 5 1500X: 213,481Ryzen 5 1500X213,481i7-2600K: 225i7-2600K225Ryzen 5 1400: 237,491Ryzen 5 1400237,4910261

Za kraj, dobar stari wPrime kojeg je 2990WX jednostavno “razvalio”. Ni 2950X nije loš i donosi solidno ubrzanje u odnosu na 1950X.

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

Stranica 6 od 9

OGLAS