Rezultati testova – 2.dio
Gaming
|
 |
| Dirt 3 (1680×1050, High, 0xAA) |
| A8-3850 |
| 32,54 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 @ OC |
| 29,7 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 |
| 22,93 |
 |
|
|
| Foxconn A75M |
| 16,12 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
5 |
|
| |
| Heaven B. (1920×1200,DX11, 0xAA, High, no tess#) |
| AMD A8-3850 |
| 8,8 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 @ OC |
| 8,5 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 |
| 7,1 |
 |
|
|
| Foxconn A75M |
| 5 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Lost Planet 2 (1680×1050, DX11, Low, 0xAA) |
| A8-3850 |
| 26,7 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 @ OC |
| 25,6 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 |
| 19,8 |
 |
|
|
| Foxconn A75M |
| 13,9 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
8 |
|
| |
| Mafia II (1680×1050, High, 0xAA) |
| A8-3850 |
| 21,3 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 @ OC |
| 20,4 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 |
| 15,9 |
 |
|
|
| Foxconn A75M |
| 11,2 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
2 |
|
| |
| S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Cop 19×12 (DX10, High, 0xAA) |
| AMD A8-3850 |
| 27 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 @ OC |
| 17,5 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 |
| 13,75 |
 |
|
|
| Intel Core i5-2500K |
| 10,8 |
 |
|
|
| Foxconn A75M |
| 9,5 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
8 |
|
| |
| S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Cop 19×12 (DX11, High, 0xAA) |
| AMD A8-3850 |
| 17,5 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 @ OC |
| 15,75 |
 |
|
|
| Sapphire Pure Platinum A75 |
| 12,5 |
 |
|
|
| Foxconn A75M |
| 8,5 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
8 |
|
| |
U igrama se najviše osjeti razlika u nižoj brzini radne memorije na Lynx platformi. A6-3650 gubi i do 30% performansi silaskom s 1866MHz na 1600MHz. Overclocking osnovnog takta sa 100MHz na 134MHz donosi porast GPU takta sa 444MHz na 600MHz, što se lijepo osjeti na performansama.
Overclocking
|
 |
| x264 Benchmark(fps) |
| AMD A8-3850 @ 3.77MHz |
| 82,68 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 @ 3.485GHz |
| 78,34 |
 |
|
|
| AMD Phenom II X4 840 |
| 66,79 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A8-3850 |
| 66,31 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 |
| 61,14 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Cinebench 11.5 CPU (pts) |
| AMD A8-3850 @ 3.77MHz |
| 4,49 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 @ 3.485GHz |
| 4,02 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A8-3850 |
| 3,45 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 |
| 3,11 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Cinebench 11.5 OpenGL (pts) |
| AMD A8-3850 @ 3.77MHz |
| 34,8 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A8-3850 |
| 31,89 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 @ 3.485GHz |
| 29,73 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 |
| 24,09 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
5 |
|
| |
| 3DMark Vantage (Performance) |
| AMD A8-3850 @ 3.77GHz |
| 4941 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A8-3850 |
| 4335 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 @ 3.485GHz |
| 3969 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 |
| 3085 |
 |
|
|
| Intel Core i5-2500K @ OC |
| 2902 |
 |
|
|
| Intel Core i5-2500K |
| 1755 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| 0 |
10 |
00 |
20 |
00 |
30 |
00 |
40 |
00 |
50 |
|
00 |
|
| |
| wPrime 1024M (s) |
| AMD A8-3850 @ 3.77GHz |
| 312,781 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 @ 3.485GHz |
| 342,671 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A8-3850 |
| 410,764 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 |
| 447,626 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Media Converter 7 (s) |
| GTX460 @ CUDA |
| 75 |
 |
|
|
| Core i7-2600K |
| 85 |
 |
|
|
| A8-3850 @ 3.77GHz |
| 99 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 @ CPU @ 3.485GHz |
| 99 |
 |
|
|
| Core i5-2300 |
| 100 |
 |
|
|
| Core i5-2500K |
| 102 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 @ ATI Stream @ 3.485GHz |
| 103 |
 |
|
|
| AMD Phenom II X4 840 |
| 106 |
 |
|
|
| A8-3850 @ CPU |
| 109 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 @ CPU |
| 116 |
 |
|
|
| A8-3850 @ ATI Stream |
| 118 |
 |
|
|
| AMD A6-3650 @ ATI Stream |
| 126 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
6 |
|
| |
Dobar overclocking uvijek donosi solidan rast performansi. Tako je i u ovom slučaju, A6-3650 na skoro 3.5GHz pokazuje zube i donosi sasvim respektabilne performanse. Prava je šteta što Foxconn ne dozvoljava OC.
Za kraj potrošnja, konfiguracija s Foxconn pločom tek mrvicu manje troši od Sapphire kombinacije. Overclocking pak donosi znatan rast potrošnje, zagrijavanja ali kao što smo vidjeli i performansi.