Rezultati testova – drugi dio
Crysis 3
|
 |
| 1920×1200 (Very High, FXAA, 16xAF) |
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 75,642 |
 |
|
|
| AMD HD7990 |
| 71,523 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 63,948 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 62,325 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 61,305 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 59,129 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 58,221 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 56,588 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 48,56 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 46,72 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 45,86 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 44,203 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 42,549 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX670 DCU Mini |
| 40,916 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 36,84 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 34,322 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 33,873 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 33,378 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 32,202 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 32,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 (VH, FXAA, AF16X) |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 42,948 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 42,843 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 40,379 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 39,649 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 36,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Kod zahtjevnog je Crysisa potrebno smanjiti razinu detalja za dobar gameplay na jednoj kartici. Dvije kartice ponovno briljiraju i po performansama sjedaju između 290 i 290X.
Hitman Absolution
|
|
| 1920×1200 @ Ultra |
| AMD HD7990 |
| 93,23 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 78,22 |
|
|
|
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 74,5 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 72,52 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 68,32 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 67,49 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 62,37 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 60,11 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 56,11 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 55,62 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 50,37 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 49,38 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 45,85 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 42,29 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 42,06 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 41,1 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 38,95 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 38,2 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 34,54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 @ Ultra |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 53,39 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 50,39 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 48,8 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 47,03 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 42,25 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 26,78 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 26,55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
I kod Hitmana je potrebno snižavati razinu detalja za igru na jednoj kartici, a ovdje ni CFX performanse nisu tako sjajne u odnosu na 290 karticu, premda lako nadmašuju GTX780.
Metro Last Light
|
|
| 1920×1200 (VH, AF16X) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 83,67 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 72,33 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 69,33 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 69 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 64 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 61 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 54,33 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 40,67 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 40 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 38 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 37,33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 (VH, AF16X) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 59,67 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 50,33 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 49 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 46,67 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 46,33 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 26,52 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 26,33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Last Light je dosta zahtjevan i bes SSAO-a, pa je razinu detalja i tu potrebno sniziti kako bi sve teklo glatko sa jednom karticom. CFX drastično poboljšava gameplay i na višoj je rezoluciji to brže i od 290 i od 290X.
