Rezultati testova – treći dio
Sleeping Dogs
|
 |
| 1920×1200 @ Extreme |
| AMD HD7990 |
| 80,5 |
 |
|
|
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 71,5 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 67,3 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 66,8 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 65,3 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 61,7 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 57,9 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 56,1 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 49,4 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 48,9 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 48 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 47,8 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 41,1 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX670 DCU Mini |
| 36,8 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 35,4 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 34,5 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 34,5 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 33,1 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 31,9 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 31,6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 @ Extreme |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 43,7 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 42,2 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 41,1 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 39,8 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 34,5 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 20,2 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 19,9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Ni u ovome naslovu jedna kartica nije dovoljna za igranje u punim detaljima na 1080p ili 1200p. No, CFX performanse su stvarno dobre i približavaju se onima dvije 270X kartice i debelo nadmašuju čak i 290X.
Tomb Raider
|
|
| 1920×1200 (Ultimate) |
| AMD HD7990 |
| 101 |
|
|
|
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 87,9 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 83 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 80,2 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 79,1 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 75,1 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 70,9 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 69,5 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 60,4 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 59,6 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 57,7 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 56,7 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 49,5 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX670 DCU Mini |
| 45,4 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 43,8 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 41,8 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 40,9 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 40,3 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 39,8 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 39,8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 (Ultimate) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 56,9 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 54,1 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 53,5 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 51,2 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 45,9 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 27,7 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 27,6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
I u ovom je naslovu potrebno razinu detalja smanjiti sa Ultimate na Ultra za dobar gameplay na jednoj kartici. CFX performanse su jako dobre, ponovno iznad 290X i to na obje rezolucije.
Overclocking
|
|
| Hitman Absolution (1920×1200@VH) |
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC @ OC |
| 41,74 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 38,95 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 38,2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Bioshock Infinite (1920×1200; Ultra@DDOF) |
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC @ OC |
| 55,89 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 51,9 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 51,34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Sleeping Dogs (1920×1200@Extreme) |
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC @ OC |
| 35,7 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 33,1 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 31,9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Tomb Raider (1920×1200@Ultimate) |
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC @ OC |
| 43,4 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 39,8 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 39,8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Obje smo kartice bez problema natjerali na maksimalno dozvoljene taktove u CCC-u, pa u tablicama pokazujemo rezultat samo jedne kartice. Ipak, porast performansi nije nešto što treba hvaliti, a žao nam je što je Gigabyteica koja svakako ima potencijala ograničena na taj način.
OpenCL performanse su vrlo dobre, uz odličan porast sa CFX-om.
