Rezultati testova – prvi dio
Ako je suditi po 3DMarku, Toxic model je jako brz i mogao bi ući u teritorij referentne GTX780 kartice, dok je Vapor-X nešto malo brža od konkurentne DCU II TOP, unatoč mrvicu nižem GPU taktu.
Battlefield 4
|
 |
| 1920×1200 (Ultra) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 79,994 |
 |
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 72,536 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 70,627 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 66,261 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 64,264 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 52,847 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 43,982 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 42,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 (Ultra) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 68,517 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 49,926 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 49,69 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 48,965 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 48,25 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 29,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Battlefield 4 performanse su izvrsne kod Toxic modela i on se sasvim približio jačem R9 290 modelu na nižoj rezoluciji. Na višoj je čak i ulovio GTX780. 270X Vapor-X je dovoljno brza na nižoj, dok bi se za solidni igrivost na višoj rezoluciji trebala smanjiti razina detalja.
Bioshock Infinite
|
|
| 1920×1200 (Ultra) |
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 140,7 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 130,08 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 129,94 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 124,27 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 123,22 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 118,14 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 116,64 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 108,35 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 106,19 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 100,77 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 100,38 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 91,37 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 89,81 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 87,54 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 75,86 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 74,77 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 72,64 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 69,69 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 68,45 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 61,6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 1920×1200 (Ultra w# DDOF) |
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 114,2 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 109,89 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 100,28 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 96,66 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 93,73 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 89,63 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 85,78 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 81,14 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 80,69 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 80,62 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 75,47 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 72,85 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 67,41 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 61,45 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 56,09 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 54,96 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 53,99 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 51,9 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 51,34 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 51,2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 (Ultra) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 89,33 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 85,78 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 85,51 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 80,55 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 76,52 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 71,9 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 48,5 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 43,78 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 43,73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 (Ultra w# DDOF) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 71,69 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 63,43 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 60,02 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 59,19 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 58,34 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 52,2 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 34,71 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 31,85 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 31,81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Toxic model ponovno pokazuje izvrsne performanse i bježi daleko ispred MSI-evog TwinFrozr modela, a pri tome skoro dostiže i GTX780 u Asusovoj DCU II OC izvedbi, no tako je sve dok se ne uključi DDOF kada se GTX780 ipak odlijepi za veću prednost. Zanimljivo je kako Toxic u višoj rezoluciji sa DDOF-om ima sasvim pristojne performanse s kojima se može lijepo igrati. Vapor-X model je konstantno malo ispred DCU II TOP konkurenta.
Hitman Absolution
|
|
| 1920×1200 @ Ultra |
| AMD HD7990 |
| 93,23 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 78,22 |
|
|
|
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 74,5 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 72,52 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 68,32 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 67,49 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 62,37 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 60,11 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 58,82 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 56,11 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 55,62 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 50,37 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 49,38 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 45,85 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 42,29 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 42,11 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 42,06 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 41,1 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 38,95 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 38,2 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 34,54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 @ Ultra |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 53,39 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 50,39 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 48,8 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 47,03 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 46,37 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 42,25 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 29,38 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 26,78 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 26,55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
I u ovom naslovu se Toxic prijeti overclockiranoj GTX780, a za oko 6% bježi ispred HD7970 GHz Editiona. Na višoj se rezoluciji odlično drži i dosta je ispred GTX780. Vapor-X cijelo to vrijeme drži svoju prednost ispred DCU II TOP modela, dok na višoj rezoluciji ostvaruje prednost od oko 10% ispred overclockiranih 270 modela (bez X).
