Rezultati testova – drugi dio
Metro Last Light
|
 |
| 1920×1200 (VH, AF16X) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 83,67 |
 |
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 72,33 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 69,33 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 69 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 64 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 61 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 58 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 54,33 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 41 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 40,67 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 40 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 38 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 37,33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 (VH, AF16X) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 59,67 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 50,33 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 49 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 46,67 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 46,33 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 42,67 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 29 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 26,52 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 26,33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Zahtjevni Metro malo guši slabiju karticu već i pri nižoj rezoluciji, dok je za savršenu igrivost na višoj i kod jače kartice potrebno malo smanjiti detalje. Ovo je Nvidijin teritorij i tu GTX780 ostvaruje veliku premoć.
Sleeping Dogs
|
|
| 1920×1200 @ Extreme |
| AMD HD7990 |
| 80,5 |
|
|
|
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 71,5 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 67,3 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 66,8 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 65,3 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 61,7 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 57,9 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 56,1 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 54 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 49,4 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 48,9 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 48 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 47,8 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 41,1 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX670 DCU Mini |
| 36,8 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 36,1 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 35,4 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 34,5 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 34,5 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 33,1 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 31,9 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 31,6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 @ Extreme |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 43,7 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 42,2 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 41,1 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 39,8 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 35 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 34,5 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 22,9 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 20,2 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 19,9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Ponovno izvrstan rezultat Toxic modela koji se na nižoj rezoluciji približava R9 290 performansama, dok mu na višoj jača kartica ipak bježi. Vapor-X je opet ispred Asusa na nižoj rezoluciji.
Tomb Raider
|
|
| 1920×1200 (Ultimate) |
| AMD HD7990 |
| 101 |
|
|
|
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 87,9 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 83 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 80,2 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 79,1 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 75,1 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 70,9 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 69,5 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 66 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 60,4 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 59,6 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 57,7 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 56,7 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 49,5 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX670 DCU Mini |
| 45,4 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 44,4 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 43,8 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 41,8 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 40,9 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 40,3 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 39,8 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 39,8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 (Ultimate) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 56,9 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 54,1 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 53,5 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 51,2 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 47,8 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 45,9 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 31,2 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 27,7 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 27,6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
I tu je situacija ista kao i u prethodnom naslovu, pri čemu se prednost R9 290 povećava s porastom rezolucije.
Overclocking
|
|
| Bioshock Infinite (1920×1200) |
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic @ OC |
| 86,46 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 81,14 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X @ OC |
| 58,87 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 56,09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Hitman Absolution (1920×1200) |
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic @ OC |
| 62,67 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 58,82 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X @ OC |
| 44,52 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 42,11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Metro LL (1920×1200) |
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic @ OC |
| 60,67 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 58 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X @ OC |
| 42,33 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Sleeping Dogs (1920×1200) |
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic @ OC |
| 57,4 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 54 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X @ OC |
| 38,1 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 36,1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Performanse Toxic modela su overclockingom u prosjeku porasle za oko 6%, a Vapor-X modela nešto malo ispod 5%. Nije loše u trenutku kada zatreba malo boosta sto će svakako prije zatrebati kod slabije kartice.
